Assessment of the regional source contributions to PM2.5 mass concentration in Beijing
1. Introduction
Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) is the most important atmospheric environmental pollution issue in China (Wang et al. 2014). Even though the average mass burden of PM2.5 in 74 pilot cities located in East China has slowly declined following the‘Air pollution prevention action plan’ released by the State Council of China, Beijing, the capital city and a megacity located at the northern tip of the North China Plain (NCP),has still suffered from air quality deterioration in the past few years since 2013 (Guo et al. 2014; Zhu et al. 2016). The atmospheric pollution here has serious adverse effects on public health and visibility and can lead to huge economic losses. For example, the direct cost to health and transportation due to the severe haze event that took place in January 2013 over the NCP was at least 23 billion RMB(Mu and Zhang 2013). Previous studies have shown that the components of PM2.5 and its precursors are extremely complex (Yuan et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2016), and the pollutants are emitted from various anthropogenic sources(Xu et al. 2013; Zhao et al. 2015). In addition, the formation of secondary aerosols, which provides about 60% of the contribution to PM2.5 concentration in Beijing (Han et al. 2015), includes numerous chemical and microphysical processes. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the major source contributions and draft appropriate PM2.5 control strategies to mitigate air pollution in this region.
吴邦伟将他的一生都献给了体育事业,为中国体育做出了重要的贡献;同时他也是近代中国较早深入研究社会体育的学者之一,但迄今为止,尚未有学者对其社会体育思想进行研究。研究以大成数据库、超星百链、超星读秀等数据库检索到的吴邦伟四十余篇期刊论文、演讲稿和数本著作为基础,对他的社会体育贡献、思想进行深入剖析。在全民健身如火如荼开展的当下,对其体育思想进行深入探讨,不仅是对老一辈体育人的怀念,同时也是回顾历史,汲取前辈的体育智慧,为当代体育发展提供一些借鉴意义。
Several control strategies for improving the air quality have been implemented in Beijing during recent years.As reported by the Beijing Environmental Status Bulletin(http://www.bjepb.gov.cn/bjhrb/xxgk/ywdt/hjzlzk/hjzkgb65/index.html), the emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2),nitrogen oxides (NOx), and ammonia-nitrogen stably reduced during the past three years, with annual average reductions of 12.38%, 9.57%, and 8.40%, respectively. The annual average mass concentration of PM2.5 in Beijing in 2013 was 89.5 μg m−3, which then reduced to 73 μg m−3 in 2016. However, the reduction in the ambient PM2.5 mass concentration did not exactly coincide with the reduction in emissions during the last three years. The number of serious pollution days was 46 in 2015, which was one more day than in 2014. The indication, therefore, is that the air pollution in this region is probably affected by high emissions combined with complex impact factors, such as the regional transport due to Beijing’s unique geography and distinctive weather patterns (Ren et al. 2003).
Approaches that determine the contributions of sources help with investigating the features of regional transport in the neighboring area of a polluted city. Several studies have applied source apportionment methods,such as Positive Matrix Factorization or Chemical Mass Balance, to identify the source contribution to multiple aerosol components in Beijing (Yu et al. 2013; Yao et al.2016), and have obtained numerous valuable results.Compared with traditional source apportionment analysis,a chemistry and transport model combined with source apportionment technology can be an effective method to reasonably capture the nonlinear interaction among pollutants at high temporal resolution. However, related research using appropriate numerical simulation tools is lacking, and a comprehensive understanding of the source contributions in the NCP has yet to be achieved. Therefore,in the present study, a source apportionment tool, ISAM(Integrated Source Apportionment Method), coupled with a regional air quality modeling system, RAMS-CMAQ(Regional Atmospheric Modeling System and Community Multiscale Air Quality), was applied to provide a high temporal resolution analysis of the contributions from local and regional sources to the PM2.5 mass burden in Beijing.
Table 1. Aerosol components, geometric standard deviation (σ),and geometric mean radius (ro) of each size distribution mode.
Notes: ASO4, sulfate aerosol; ANO3, nitrate aerosol; ANH4, ammonium aerosol; BC, black carbon; OC, organic carbon.
2.0 0.150 Coarse dust Dust 3.0 0.300 Coarse sea salt Sea salt 3.5 0.300 Mode Aerosol components σ ro (μm)Aitken ASO4, ANO3, ANH4, BC, OC 1.7 0.015 Accumulation ASO4, ANO3, ANH4, BC, OC, Dust,Sea salt
2. Methods
The RAMS-CMAQ modeling system was used to simulate the transport, transformation and deposition of aerosols and their precursors. The major component of this modeling system is CMAQ (version 5.0.2), released in 2014 by the US Environmental Protection Agency for simulating a variety of environmental issues (Eder and Yu 2006; Mathur et al. 2008) including tropospheric ozone, haze pollution,and acid deposition. In the modeling system, the SAPRC99(Statewide Air Pollution Research Centre) and ISORROPIA(Nenes, Pandis, and Pilinis 1998) schemes were chosen to estimate the gas-phase concentrations and aerosol particles, respectively. The sixth-generation modal CMAQ aerosol model (AERO6) were applied to simulate the gas-phase chemistry mechanisms and formation, dynamic processes of aerosols. The size distributions of aerosols were treated as three modes (Aitken, accumulation, and coarse) following a log normal distribution, as shown in Table 1. The numerical prediction model, RAMS (version 6.0) (Cotton et al. 2003), was coupled with CMAQ offline to provide the meteorological field. The ECMWF reanalysis datasets(spatial resolution: 1° × 1°) were used to supply the background meteorological fields and sea surface temperature.The emissions inventory used was as follows: The anthropogenic emissions of primary aerosols and their precursors were obtained from the latest version (base year: 2012) of the MIX Asian Emissions Inventory developed for MICS-ASIA III (Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia, phase III) (Lei et al. 2011; Lu, Zhang, and Streets 2011). This is a monthly based inventory, with a spatial resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° and, involves eight types of pollutants: carbon monoxide, NOx, SO2, volatile organic compounds, black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), PM2.5,and PM10 (coarse particulate matter). Additionally, the NOx and ammonia from agriculture and NOx emissions from aircraft and lightning were provided by REAS (Regional Emissions Inventory in Asia; http://www.jamstec.go.jp/frsgc/research/d4/emission.htm) and the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (Olivier et al.1994), respectively. The Global Fire Emissions Database,Version 3 (van der Werf et al. 2010), was used for the biomass-burning emissions from forest wild fires, savanna burning, and slash-and-burn agriculture.
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China [grant number 2014CB953802]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 91544221],[grant number 41475098]; and the Russian Scientific Fund[grant number 14-47-00049].
CONTACT ZHANG Mei-Gen mgzhang@mail.iap.ac.cn
Figure 1. Model domain used in this study and the geographic locations of Hebei, Beijing, Tianjin, Tangshan, Baoding,Shijiazhuang, Handan, Shanxi, and Shandong.
3. Results and discussion
In future work the modeling system will be used to provide detailed information on the components of Beijing’s PM2.5 pollution. In addition, the nonlinear relationships between secondary aerosols and their precursors should be investigated to clarify the contributions from surrounding regions and explore more effective strategies to improve the air quality and prevent the occurrence of haze in Beijing.
Figure 2. (a) Horizontal distribution of the monthly average mass concentration of PM2.5 and the surface wind field in July 2015. (b–f)Contribution percentage to the PM2.5 mass concentration from Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong, and Shanxi.
The simulation results indicated that the in fluence of PM2.5 particles emitted from Beijing and Tianjin mainly concentrated in their own urban areas, and the major contributors to the PM2.5 mass concentration in the NCP were the emissions from Hebei and Shandong. At least 30% of the PM2.5 mass concentration in the NCP was provided by the sources in these two provinces. However, the contribution from Shanxi province was very low due to the barrier of the Taihang Mountains. Focusing on Beijing, the effect of emissions control strategies executed in recent years was obvious, and the local contribution to the PM2.5 concentration in July was just 20%–30%. In addition, the southerly wind, which can carry pollutants from the southern regions, was an important factor impacting the aerosol loading in Beijing. About 50% of the PM2.5 mass concentration was contributed by the regional transport from Hebei,Shandong, and Tianjin. The most important surrounding contributor to the PM2.5 mass concentration in Beijing was Hebei, which contributed more than 25%. Considering the hourly variation, the contribution percentage varied significantly with the mass burden of PM2.5. An important phenomenon was that the contribution from surrounding regions enhanced obviously when the air quality became worse, indicating regional transport provides more to the PM2.5 mass burden against a pollution background in Beijing. Therefore, it is suggested that regional-scale collaborations should be implemented based not only on abating local emissions, but also the coordinated control of emissions from surrounding areas, especially during pollution periods in Beijing.
Figure 3. (a) Time series of the regional average PM2.5 mass concentration (μg m−3, in which CA, MP and SP represent clear air, moderate pollution, and serious pollution, respectively. (b)Contribution percentage (% to the PM2.5 mass concentration from local and regional transport sources.
4. Conclusions
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Figure 3 presents the hourly regional average mass concentration of PM2.5 and the contribution from local sources and regional transport (Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong, Shanxi,and other regions) to Beijing in July. Figure 3(a) shows that the mass burden of PM2.5 exceeded the clean-air level of 75 μg m−3 on several days in July, and the daily variation was also obvious. Even though the monthly average air quality was good, pollution still occurred in almost half of the month. As analyzed above, most of the PM2.5 mass burden in Beijing was contributed by pollutants from Hebei,Shandong, Tianjin, and local sources (about 70%). The percentage fluctuated obviously with the diurnal variation of the PM2.5 mass concentration. In addition, the aerosols from the provinces of Shandong and Hebei provided the highest contribution to the PM2.5 concentration in Beijing in the first half and second half of the month, respectively.This phenomenon was probably caused by the impact of different meteorological fields. Table 2 presents the contribution percentage of the PM2.5 mass concentration to Beijing from heavy pollution regions, other background regions, and boundary and initial conditions against backgrounds of clear air, moderate pollution, and serious pollution. The de finitions of the different air quality levels based on the mass concentration of PM2.5 were released by the Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, and are as follows: clean air is below 75 μg m−3; moderate pollution is 75–140 μg m−3; and serious pollution is above 140 μg m−3. The regional average contribution in Beijing from local emissions was 20%–25.9%, which was obviously lower than the high value in the urban district. In addition,the contribution from Hebei was comparable with that from the local area (both about 25%) against a clear-air background, and even increased (27.37% against a moderate pollution background and 30.81% against a serious pollution background) when the air quality became worse in Beijing. This phenomenon also occurred for the contribution from Shandong, Tianjin, and Shanxi. The percentage for Shandong and Tianjin increased from 11.89% to 15.94% and 8.45% to 12.33%, respectively, when the air quality changed from clean air to serious pollution. On the other hand, the local contribution in Beijing reduced to its lowest value of 20.01% against the serious pollution background. The percentage of the contribution from other clean regions also reduced, from 15.17% to 8.39%.These findings suggest important roles played by the PM2.5 emissions of surrounding pollution regions in affecting the air quality of Beijing during pollution periods.
The mass concentrations of the major aerosols (sulfate,nitrate, ammonium, BC, OC, dust, and sea salt) over the NCP in July 2016 were simulated by the modeling system.Figure 2(a) presents the monthly average PM2.5 mass burden spatial distribution and surface wind field in July. The air quality remained at Grade II standard (35–75 μg m−3)in Beijing and Tianjin. However, the PM2.5 mass concentration was higher than 100 μg m−3 in the southern part of Hebei Province and western part of Shandong Province.The southerly wind field dominated the model domain in this month, indicating that air masses could be transported from the polluted regions in the south. Furthermore,Figure 2(b)–(e) show the PM2.5 contribution percentage of Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong, and Shanxi, respectively.Generally, the PM2.5 particles emitted from local sources in Beijing and Tianjin were mainly concentrated in their own urban regions, and the percentage could exceed 30%. The contribution to the PM2.5 from Tianjin was higher than 8%in the southern part of Beijing. However, the contribution from Beijing and Tianjin was quite small (lower than 5%) in other regions, which indicated that the in fluence of PM2.5 particles from Beijing and Tianjin was probably small over the whole NCP area. The local sources generally provided a contribution of more than 30% in Hebei Province, and the highest values (more than 50%) were mainly concentrated in its southern (Baoding–Shijiazhuang–Handan)and eastern (Tangshan) parts. The mass burden of PM2.5 in Beijing was obviously in fluenced by that from Hebei,because the percentage shown in Figure 2(d) reached 20%–30%. However, the PM2.5 contribution from Hebei to that in Shandong was generally lower than 5%. As shown in Figure 2(e), the PM2.5 mass concentration in Shandong Province was mainly derived from local emissions, and the contribution percentage could exceed 50% over the whole province. This was probably the main reason for the small contribution from other regions. Moreover, the contribution from Shandong to the PM2.5 concentration in Beijing was also very strong, and the percentage could reach 10%–15%. On the other hand, the contribution from Shanxi to that in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei was very small,and the main reason was probably the barrier to pollutant transport imposed by the Taihang Mountains located in the east of Shanxi Province. In conclusion, the PM2.5 mass burden in Beijing was mainly contributed by its own local emissions (10%–40%), but still significantly disturbed by regional transport from other surrounding regions, such as the provinces of Hebei and Shandong.
“当时我不知道有侍酒师这个行业,但我有好几个室友当了很久侍酒师以后想回去学酿酒,酿一款自己喜欢的酒。然后我就开始查侍酒师是什么,也查了关于葡萄酒行业一些最高的证书。”当时他查得很仔细,不但知道经过努力和学习可以达到的最顶端的证书或知识到哪里,也搞清楚了如今葡萄酒圈非常盛行的WSET从一级到四级的区别,甚至连“葡萄酒大师和侍酒师大师”都去查过一遍,知道那是葡萄酒领域殿堂级的存在……“我从2005年开始学葡萄酒,很快就去查了这些,当时我就知道,这是应该要做到的。”
Table 2. Contribution percentages of the PM2.5 mass concentration to Beijing from several regions against different air quality backgrounds.
Serious pollution (%)Beijing 25.90 21.06 20.01 Tianjin 8.45 10.67 12.33 Hebei 25.73 27.37 30.81 Shandong 11.89 13.19 15.94 Shanxi 3.22 4.28 4.51 Boundary condition Region Clean air (%)Moderate pollution (%)9.48 9.80 7.64 Initial condition 0.18 0.32 0.35 Others 15.17 13.30 8.39
Disclosure statement
A source apportionment tool, ISAM, coupled with an air quality modeling system, RAMS-CMAQ, was applied to simulate the aerosol mass concentrations and investigate the contribution features of regional transport to the PM2.5 mass burden in Beijing. All major aerosol components were considered in the modeling system, and the contributions from local and surrounding sources (Tianjin,Hebei, Shandong, and Shanxi) to Beijing were estimated and analyzed.
Funding
A powerful and efficient implementation of ISAM coupled online with CMAQ was used to track the PM2.5 from emission regions surrounding Beijing. Compared with its previous version, Tagged Species Source Apportionment(Wang, Chien, and Tonnesen 2009), ISAM improved the approach for the advection of tagged tracers and the tracking of precursor reactions, and increased the flexibility of application by minimizing data preparation (Kwok,Napelenok, and Baker 2013). Brie fly, the major linear processes, including advection transport, vertical diffusion,and dry deposition, were treated as parallel processes based on the CMAQ calculation. An updated piecewise parabolic algorithm was also applied for reasonably estimating the advection flux. The nonlinear processes,including cloud processes, aerosol processes, and wet deposition, were treated as independent mechanisms based on weighting the aerosol generation or scavenging. In addition, the nonlinear gas-phase chemical interactions was difficult in balancing computational efficiency and accuracy. Therefore, a hybrid approach, which employs the direct sensitivity methods as linear equations using Lower Upper decomposition (Yang, Wilkinson, and Russell 1997),was applied in ISAM for solving the variation of tagged bulk concentration. In this study, ISAM was set to track the transport and chemical reactions of the major aerosol components (sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, BC, and OC) and their precursors. The in fluence of the tagged grid could be quantitatively aggregated from the output results of ISAM-CMAQ.
References
Cotton, W., R. Pielke, G. Walko, G. Liston, C. Tremback, H. Jiang, R.McAnelly, et al. 2003. “RAMS 2001: Current Status and Future Directions.” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 82: 5–29.
Eder, B., and S. Yu. 2006. “An Evaluation of Model Performance of EPA Models-3/CMAQ.” Atmospheric Environment 40: 4811–4824.
Guo, S., M. Hu, M. Zamora, J. Peng, D. Shang, J. Zheng, Z. Du, et al. 2014. “Elucidating Severe Urban Haze Formation in China.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 17373–17378.
Han, L., S. Cheng, G. Zhuang, H. Ning, H. Wang, W. Wei, and X.Zhao. 2015. “The Changes and Long-Range Transport of PM2.5 in Beijing in the past Decade.” Atmospheric Environment 110:186–195.
Han, X., M. Zhang, J. Gao, S. Wang, and F. Chai. 2014. “Modeling Analysis of the Seasonal Characteristics of Haze Formation in Beijing.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14: 10231–10248.Han, X., M. Zhang, and J. Tao. 2013. “Modeling Aerosol Impacts on Atmospheric Visibility in Beijing with RAMS-CMAQ.”Atmospheric Environment 72 (2): 177–191.
Han, X., M. Zhang, L. Zhu, and A. Skorokhod. 2016. “Assessment of the Impact of Emissions Reductions on Air Quality over North China Plain.” Atmospheric Pollution Research 7 (2): 249–259.
Kwok, R., S. Napelenok, and K. Baker. 2013. “Implementation and Evaluation of PM2.5 Source Contribution Analysis in a Photochemical Model.” Atmospheric Environment 80: 398–407.
Lei, Y., Q. Zhang, K. He, and D. Streets. 2011. “Primary Anthropogenic Aerosol Emission Trends for China, 1990–2005.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11: 931–954.
Lu, Z., Q. Zhang, and D. Streets. 2011. “Sulfur Dioxide and Primary Carbonaceous Aerosol Emissions in China and India, 1996–2010.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11: 9839–9864.
Mathur, R., S. Yu, D. Kang, and K. Schere. 2008. “Assessment of the Winter-Time Performance of Developmental Particulate Matter Forecasts with the Eta-CMAQ Modeling System.”Journal of Geophysical Research 113: D02303.
Mu, Q., and S. Zhang. 2013. “An Evaluation of the Economic Loss due to the Heavy Haze during January 2013 in China.” China Environmental Sciences 11: 034.
Nenes, A., S. N. Pandis, and C. Pilinis. 1998. “ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols.” Aquatic Geochemistry 4: 123–152.
Olivier, J., A. Bouwman, C. Maas, and J. Berdowski. 1994.“Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research.”Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 31: 93–106.
Ren, Z., Q. Gao, F. Su, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, and X. Yang. 2003. “The Regional Characteristics of the Atmospheric Environment and the Impact of Dust Storm in Beijing.” Engineering Sciences 5: 49–56. (in Chinese).
Sun, Y., Q. Jiang, Y. Xu, and Z. Li. 2016. “Aerosol Characterization over the North China Plain: Haze Life Cycle and Biomass Burning Impacts in Summer.” Journal of Geophysical Research 121 (5): 2508–2521.
Wang, Z., C. Chien, and G. Tonnesen. 2009. “Development of a Tagged Species Source Apportionment Algorithm to Characterize Three-Dimensional Transport and Transformation of Precursors and Secondary Pollutants.”Journal of Geophysical Research 114: D21206.
Wang, Y., L. Yao, L. Wang, Z. Liu, D. Ji, G. Tang, J. Zhang, et al. 2014.“Mechanism for the Formation of the January 2013 Heavy Haze Pollution Episode over Central and Eastern China.”Science China Earth Science 57 (1): 14–25.
van der Werf, G., J. Randerson, L. Giglio, G. Collatz, M. Mu, P.Kasibhatla, D. Morton, et al. 2010. “Global Fire Emissions and the Contribution of Deforestation, Savanna, Forest,Agricultural, and Peat Fires (1997–2009).” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10: 11707–11735.
Xu, W., C. Zhao, L. Ran, Z. Deng, N. Ma, P. Liu, W. Lin, et al. 2013.“A New Approach to Estimate Pollutant Emissions Based on Trajectory Modeling and Its Application in the North China Plain.” Atmospheric Environment 71: 75–83.
Yang, Y., J. Wilkinson, and A. Russell. 1997. “Fast, Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Photochemical Models.”Environmental Sciences Technology 31 (10): 2859–2868.
Yao, L., L. Yang, Q. Yuan, C. Yan, C. Dong, C. Meng, X. Sui, et al.2016. “Sources Apportionment of PM2.5 in a Background Site in the North China Plain.” Science of the Total Environment 541:590–598.
Yu, L., G. Wang, R. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Song, B. Wu, X. Li, et al.2013. “Characterization and Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in an Urban Environment in Beijing.” Aerosol and Air Quality Research 13 (2): 574–583.
Yuan, Q., W. Li, S. Zhou, L. Yang, J. Chi, X. Sui, and W. Wang. 2015.“Integrated Evaluation of Aerosols during Haze-Fog Episodes at One Regional Background Site in North China Plain.”Atmospheric Research 156: 102–110.
Zhao, H., Q. Zhang, D. Guan, S. Davis, Z. Liu, H. Huo, J. Lin, et al.2015. “Assessment of China’s Virtual Air Pollution Transport Embodied in Trade by Using a Consumption-Based Emission Inventory.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15 (12): 5443–5456.
Zhu, X., G. Tang, B. Hu, L. Wang, J. Xin, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, et al. 2016.“Regional Pollution and Its Formation Mechanism over North China Plain: A Case Study with Ceilometer Observations and Model Simulations.” Journal of Geophysical Research 121:14574–14588.