更全的杂志信息网

A hydrochemical approach to estimate mountain front recharge in an aquifer system in Tamilnadu,India

更新时间:2016-07-05

1 Introduction

The MFR is the contribution of mountains to recharging aquifers in adjacent basins along a MF.There are several techniques for the successful determination of MFR in different regions.Mohrbacher(1983)used stable isotopes and groundwater chemistry as indicators of MFR.Andrew et al.(2003)used noble gases to investigate MFR.Ping et al.(2014)have quantified groundwater recharge using the chloride mass balance method in a semi-arid mountain terrain,in South Interior British Columbia,Canada.Kambhammettu et al.(2011)evaluated three MFR estimation techniques using a numerical modeling in the Southern Jornada Del Muerto Basin,New Mexico.Table 1 lists the various studies that trialed a hydrogeochemical approach to understanding MFR.

Several previous investigations that have been undertaken in the Courtallam region but only on groundwater potentiality and fluctuation(Balasubramanian and Sastri 1994;Public Works Department(PWD)2002),quality and suitability of groundwater for domestic and irrigation purpose(Subramaniet al.2005a),and mineral composition and occurrence of various rock formation(Subramani et al.2005b).But there has been no attempt to understand the MFR either by using hydrogeochemistry or by other techniques in this region.This is the first attempt on groundwater recharge estimation using hydrogeochemistry and geostatistical tools along the foothills of Courtallam.

The main objective of our study is to estimate MFR by interpreting relevant hydrogeochemical data. Thisincludes interrelationships among a set of ions,which may vary with land-use pattern and lithology,the paper also focuses on the use of factor scores to identify hydrogeochemically active regimes represented by the major factors.This study further aims at geochemical evaluation of the aquifer system based on ionic ratios,water chemistry,hydrochemical facies,and factors controlling groundwater quality.

Table 1 Various researches that trialed a hydrogeochemical approach to understand MFR

Sl.no Title Research area References 1 An isotopic and geochemical investigation of the hydrogeologic and geothermal systems in the Safford Basin,Arizona Arizona Smalley(1983)2 Mountain-front recharge to the Tucson basin from the Santa Catalina Mountains,Arizona New Mexico,USA Plummer et al.(2004a)7 Groundwater recharge in a desert environment Southwestern,United states Arizona Morbacher(1984)3 Mountain-front recharge from the Santa Rita Mountains to the Tucson Basin Arizona Merz(1985)4 Groundwater resources of the Middle Rio Grande basin,New Mexico New Mexico Bartolino and Cole(2002)5 Quantifying Mountain Front Recharge Arizona James and Brenda(2004)6 Geochemical characterization of ground-water flow in the Santa Fe Group aquifer system,Middle Rio Grande Basin,New Mexico Plummer et al.(2004b)8 Stream-groundwater interactions in a mountain to valley transition:impacts on watershed hydrologic response and stream water chemistry 9 Stable isotope(2H,18O and 87Sr/86Sr)and hydrochemistry monitoring for groundwater hydrodynamics analysis in a karst aquifer(Gran Sasso,Central Italy)Montana Covino(2005)Central Italy Barbieri et al.(2005)10 Geochemical and isotopic investigations on groundwater residence time and flow in the Independence Basin,Mexico Arizona Baillie et al.(2007)12 Use of hydrogeochemistry and environmental isotopes for evaluation of groundwater in Qingshuihe Basin,northwestern China Mexico Mahlknecht et al.(2006)11 Quantifying water sourcesto asemiarid riparian ecosystem,San Pedro River,Arizona China Li et al.(2008)13 Recharge sources and hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in semiarid and karstic environments:A field study in the Granada Basin(Southern Spain)Southern Spain Kohfahl et al.(2008)14 Geochemical quantification of semiarid mountain recharge Southeast Arizona Wahi et al.(2008)15 A novel strategy for estimating groundwater recharge in arid mountain regions and its application to parts of the Jebel Akhdar Mountains(Sultanate of Oman)Oman Gerner(2013)

2 Study area

Courtallam is located in the northwestern part of Tirunelveli District,Tamilnadu,with an aerial coverage of 1789 km2(Fig.1).The area forms a pedimented plain of the Chittar River,which is a major tributary of the Tamiraparani River,and extends south and north of Courtallam forming a part of the Chittar,Vaippar,and Tamiraparani rivers basins.The Chittar River arises in the Courtallam hills in the study area,moves along the Tenkasi and Tirunelvelli to a distance of 60 km,and then joins with the Tambramparni River at Sivalaperi.The Jambunadi River arises in the Kulratti hills and flows in the southern part of the study area.There are several waterfalls in this region,which attract tourists and results in urbanization and increased water demand.

The area is drained by river Chittar,which originates near Courtallam with fivebeautiful fallsin Poigaimalai hill ranges of Western Ghats(Subramani et al.2005a).There are nine waterfalls in Courtallam viz.,Main falls,Chitraruvi,Shenbagadevi falls,Honey Falls,Five Falls,Tiger Falls,Old Falls,Orchard Falls,and the New Falls.Its bracing season extends particularly from June to September and contributes water to respective streams/river flowing in this region.Chittar River is considered to be non-perennial since it carries water only during the months of November and December(Subramani et al.2005a),and during thenon-monsoon periods,thegroundwater servesas the major source.A thin layer of alluvial floodplain deposits,mainly sand,is found along the banks of Chittar River.Borehole Lithology recordsreveal that the thickness of alluvial depositsismorein bajada and valley fills(about 10–15 m)(Subramani 2005),which provides more chance of recharge.

Fig.1 Index map of the study area

Geologically,the area is occupied with hornblende biotite gneisses and charnockite,composed of feldspar with quartz grains,biotite,and hornblende(Fig.2).These formations are crossed by sets of joints and fractures,which have also resulted in the weathering of the coarser rocks.Weathering occurs due to mechanical and chemical processes that take place while water in the fractures interacts with the formation(Singh et al.2003).The distribution of the weathered zone varies from place to place within the basin (Subramani 2005).The weathered zone facilitates the movement and storage of groundwater through a network of joints,faults,and lineaments,which form conspicuous structural features.Another dominant formation along the foothill is charnockite.This formation is less weathered,jointed or fractured compared to the previous one(Subramani 2005)and could,therefore,be considered as impermeable and increases the residence time of water resulting in higher rock-water interaction.

Rainfallplaysanimportantroleinrechargeprocess.Dueto topographic variations,mountainsreceivemoreprecipitation than the basin floor with asignificant fraction in theform of rain.Slopesof thisregion vary fromflatland to vertical cliffs.Courtallam isa hilly region whose height variesfrom 150 to 1500 m with narrow valleysendowed with steep slopes.The surface water from a rain storm flows rapidly down a steep hillside and have small rates of infiltration into the soil or bedrock.On theother hand,with gentlesloping or flat areas,thesurfacewater doesnot flow rapidly and thereisagreater opportunity for the water to infiltrate downward towardsthe water table(Rushton and Ward 1979)in thepediplain region and along the riparian region.Moreover,the recharge in the foothill also moves laterally along the groundwater flow direction,which adds to the increase of water level in the riparian region.The region receives an average rainfall of 917.88 mm/year as reported by Indian Meteorological Department,(IMD),which is normal.About 70%of total rainfalliscontributedbythenortheastmonsoonandrestbythe southwestmonsoonandrainfall duringthetransitionalperiod.The geomorphology,geology and structural geology of the region control the recharge and discharge of groundwater in thisregion(Salamaet al.1994).

Fig.2 Lithology with sample location points

The groundwater is contained in different aquifers of this region and their characteristics are summarized in Fig.3.The transmissivity,hydraulic conductivity,specific yield,and storativity,are maximum in porous formations followed by fractured and weathered formations.Minimum valuesalso show thesametrend irrespectiveof all thethree formations.Aquifer characteristics vary considerably depending upon lithology,topography,and nature of weathering(CGWB 2009).

1.3 样本采集及病原菌鉴定 观察病害症状,用数码相机拍照,填写样方调查表,采集典型样本压制成标本,带回实验室采用科赫法则对病原菌进行验证和鉴定。对白粉病、锈病等病症明显的病害,直接标本制片或以徒手切片镜检,参照相关资料[10-19]进行鉴定;对病症不明显的病害,进行病原菌常规组织分离[20],获得纯培养的病原菌,再进一步鉴定并做致病性测定。

The depth to water table is more at MF as compared to riparian zone(Fig.4).The AMSL map shows that the gradient is towards the southeastern part of the study area.Mountainous regions act as runoff zones due to steep gradient whereas slope of peneplain is comparatively gentle thus water is recharged,and depending upon this recharging process with respect to seasonal rainfall events,there is variation in water level(Bhagyashri et al.2011).Pediplains are very good for groundwater prospecting because they reduce the velocity of surface runoff and thus provide more chance of water accumulation(Yousef et al.2015).Thus,when the velocity of the flowing water is reduced asit reachesthe foot of mountain slopeand it starts recharging.The extent of vertical and lateral recharge depends on the thickness and extent of the aquifer(Theis 1940).

Fig.3 Aquifer parameters(CGWB 2009)

Fig.4 Groundwater flow direction of the region

Groundwater generally occurs under phreatic conditions in the weathered mantle and under semi-confined conditions in the fissured and fractured zones at deeper levels(CGWB 2009).The thicknessof theweathered zonein this region isnot uniform and variesbetween 8 and 34 m below ground level(Subramani et al.2009).In the study area,depth to water table varies between 2.1 and 16 m below ground level during pre-monsoon and between 0.91 and 16 m below ground level during post-monsoon.The water table rises during November and December,attains its maximum at January,and starts declining from February onwards and attains its deepest level during September or October(Subramani 2005).A long-term fluctuation is observed by CGWB(2009)for the period of 1991–2007,which shows that water level rises and falls within a range of 0.0021–1.1284 and 0.016–0.689 m/year,respectively.

3 Methodology

To understand the process of MFR by hydrogeochemical studies,53 groundwater sampleswerecollected during premonsoon period from hand pumps to cover different lithounits of the study area.As the study area was comprised of hilly terrains,it was difficult to collect samples for the entire area.Thus,some places were left without sampling.The water sampleswere measured for major ions such as Ca,Mg,Cl,HCO3 by titration method,Na and K by flame photometry(CL 378),and SO4,PO4,NO3 and H4SiO4 by spectrophotometer(DR 6000).Physical parameters like pH,total dissolved solids(TDS),temperature,humidity,and conductivity were analyzed using a portable water analysis kit.The analytical precision of the measurements of cations and anions were determined by calculating the ionic balance error that varies by about 5%–10%(Freeze and Cherry 1979).

Geostatistical techniques simplify and organize large geochemical datasets into meaningful information.Multivariate statistical analysisisa quantitative and independent approach of groundwater classification,and it allows grouping of groundwater samples using correlations between chemical parameters in the samples.In this study,the Statistical Package of Social Sciences(SPSS)version 10 was used for correlation analysis and factor analysis.

Major cation and anion data obtained from the laboratory analysis were used as input data for factor analysis.New groups of variables were generated from the initial dataset,which isalinear combination of original variables.An Eigenvalue of 1 was taken as a minimum for factor extraction(Kaiser 1958;Harmann 1960).The first factor obtained describes the largest part of the variance.The following factors explain smaller partsof the data variance.The factor loadings matrix was rotated to an orthogonal simple structure according to the Varimax rotation technique(Davis 1973).Higher factor loadings(close to 1 or-1)describes strong relationships(positive or negative)among variables.Factor scores are calculated for each sample and are plotted in spatial diagrams.Spatial diagrams were drawn using Map Info software(Professional 8.5)combined with Vertical Mapper.Extreme positive factor scores(>0)reflect where the sample ismost affected whereas negative factor scores reflect the samples least affected by the chemical processes.

兽面纹最具特征的两个部件,一是眼,为两圆圈;二是横梁。有的只有一道横梁,或连接两眼,或处于眼下,类似嘴唇。

4 Results and discussion

4.1 Hydrogeochemistry

Table 2 lists the maximum,minimum,and average values of different parametersin the groundwater as well as WHO(2004)standards for drinking water.In general,most of the samples of this region have high EC values which cover a major portion of the area.High EC values are noted in the western,southern,and central part of the study area.A sharp increase of ECin this region could have been caused by the factorslike land use patternssuch asagricultureand waste.High chloride,nitrate,and phosphate contentscould have been due to the association with agricultural activities,which are known to increase EC(Panabokke et al.2002;Jeyaruba and Thushyanthy 2009).

The groundwater in this region is slightly alkaline(Table 2).Thepermissiblerangefor thepHin groundwater is 6.5–8.5(WHO 2004)and all sample values fall within this range(Table 3).TDS gives the general nature of groundwater quality and extent of contamination(Davis and de Wiest 1966).The maximum concentration of TDS was found in the location named Panaiyur,located in the northernmost part of the study area.Almost all sample values fall below the permissible limit for the TDS(WHO 2004).Only four sample values have a higher concentration of TDSabove the permissible TDSlimit for drinking water(Table 3).

4.3.1 Factor analysis

Table 2 Maximum,minimum and average of thechemical constituents in groundwater(All valuesarein mg/L except ECin μs/cm,Temp in °C and pH)

Parameters Maximum Minimum Average Standard deviation(σ) Coefficient of variation(σ/μ) WHO Standard(2004)EC 4220 280.9 1668.76 949.84 0.57 –pH 7.95 6.20 7.06 0.41 0.06 8.5 TDS 1309 114 622.76 489.64 0.79 1000 Temp 37 28.5 30.78 3.59 0.12 –HCO3- 573.40 97.60 332.50 120.25 0.36 350 Ca2+ 276 24 79.40 52.66 0.66 75 Mg2+ 86.40 7.20 29.98 20.34 0.68 30 Na+ 376 54 165.78 72.25 0.44 200 K+ 93 0.90 32.96 26.36 0.80 20 Cl- 1187.50 35.45 327.04 228.46 0.70 200 NO3- 130.09 43.54 81.46 21.45 0.26 50 SO42- 3.45 0.18 0.67 0.57 0.85 200 H4SiO4 290 30 130.39 46.38 0.36 –

NO3 in water is mainly due to organic sources or from industrial and agricultural chemicals(Feth 1966).Almost 99%of the sample values exceeds the permissible limit of NO3(WHO 2004)and themaximum concentration isnoted at Virasikamani(Table 4).Elevated concentration of NO3 is noted in the northern and southwestern part of the study area,which may be due to fertilizer used in agricultural fields(Prasanna 2008),organic effluents of nitrogen fixing bacteria,leaching of animal dung,and sewage and septic tank leakage through soil and water matrix to groundwater(Chidambaram 2000).

The highest concentration of H4SiO4 is found at VeddakkuPudur(Table 4).Likewise,the highest phosphate concentration of groundwater samples at 0.52 mg/L was noted at Tenkasi.The maximum concentration of Na+is noted at Sendamaram(Table 4)and 14 samples fall above the permissible limit.The high concentration of sodium in the study area indicatesthe influence of weathering.As the major rock types present in this area are charnockite and hornblende–biotite-gneiss,the Na in groundwater is derived from the plagioclase feldspar present in the underlying rock type.(Drever 1988;Chidambaram et al.2008).

Calcium(Ca)is maximum at Pattanadinpatti.22 sample values exceed the permissible limit.The area is underlain by charnockite and hornblende-biotite-gneiss,which could be the major source to contribute Ca in the groundwater (Thivya et al. 2015). The highest concentration of Mg is noted at Panaiyur(Table 4)which is the northernmost part of the study area where charnockite is the major rock type and mostly contains Mg-rich pyroxene.Thus,it contributes Mg to the groundwater(Thivya et al.2015)and 19 samples fall above the permissible limit(WHO 2004).The maximum value of K was located around Velayudapuram,35 samples fall above the permissible limit.K concentration in this area may be derived from the weathering of K-Feldspar present in charnockite and hornblende–biotitegneiss formation(Thivya et al.2015).

From the Fig.5,it was observed that the NO3 concentration is more along the foothills.That means aquifers were recharged by the sewage from anthropogenic activities(Thivya et al.2013).In the southwestern part,weaker ionic strength with higher NO3 and in northwestern part both high ionic strength and NO3 was noted.High ionic strength indicates the lesser rate of water flow through the pore spaces in the hard rock terrain and higher residence time(Mohrbacher 1983).Weaker ionic strength indicates more fresh water recharge through the pediplains.It can be seen that river flows in this region are reflected in the varied ionic strength and recharge events.Thus,the maximum contours of all the ions fall along the foothills with high ionic strength(Fig.5)which is an indirect indication of MFR.High HCO3 along foothills also indicates predominant weathering as well as recharge(Stumm and Morgan 1996).

4.2 Hydrogeochemical facies

The hydrogeochemical facies concept was developed for identification of water type and visualization of trends of hydrochemistry(Smoor 1967;Schreiber et al.1999).Thus,the interpretation of hydrogeochemical facies is used to determine the flow pattern and chemical history of groundwater(Piper 1944;Nwankwoala and Udom 2011).The study shows the existence of four groundwater facies(Fig.6)i.e.,(i)Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3,(ii)Na–Cl–HCO3,(iii)Ca–Na–Cl–HCO3,(iv)Na–Ca–HCO3–Cl.

Table 3 Analytical values of all chemical constituents in groundwater(All values are in mg/L except EC in μs/cm,Temp in °C and pH)

Sample ID pH TDS EC Temp HCO3- Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ Cl- NO3- PO43- SO42+ H4SiO4 1 7.39 353 711 30.9 329.4 28 14.4 138 0.9 88.625 114.62 -0.01 0.38 170 2 7.39 267 524 32.4 231.8 24 12 121 4 106.35 75.12 -0.03 0.41 110 3 6.79 892 2431 33.5 256.2 180 43.2 132 10 514.025 105.67 -0.04 0.93 110 4 7.63 243 455 30.6 268.4 44 16.8 56 15 35.45 114.84 -0.04 0.18 60 5 6.77 741 1886 31.1 573.4 96 43.2 216 21 336.775 128.55 -0.02 0.55 140 6 7.97 340 641 33.4 292.8 32 12 129 18 88.625 92.22 -0.03 0.55 120 7 7 1309 3620 31 573.4 120 86.4 353 21 833.075 96.25 -0.03 3.45 130 8 7.41 718 1581 30.5 451.4 44 24 179 24 230.425 84.42 -0.03 0.74 130 9 6.9 291 566 31 170.8 40 14.4 87 21 106.35 83.55 0 0.42 290 10 7.72 839 1808 30.9 439.2 40 16.8 231 87 336.775 98.11 -0.04 0.55 90 11 7.12 778 1760 31.4 414.8 68 50.4 167 78 389.95 87.46 -0.03 0.99 170 12 6.83 616 1429 28.5 305 96 31.2 138 28 265.875 83.64 -0.03 0.55 230 13 7.22 563 1262 29.7 231.8 64 28.8 141 23 265.875 103.98 -0.04 0.57 180 14 7.94 619 1658 30.7 256.2 60 33.6 169 26 425.4 60.39 -0.04 0.76 190 15 6.43 480 1028 28.7 305 56 21.6 143 25 194.975 94.96 -0.03 0.56 180 16 6.78 619 1398 29.3 305 56 21.6 163 64 248.15 101.27 0.09 0.56 180 17 6.54 670 2858 29.9 366 120 19.2 150 26 265.875 69.43 -0.04 0.55 120 18 6.72 269 971 29.2 207.4 36 16.8 67 6 88.625 43.54 -0.04 0.45 150 19 6.89 568 962 28.6 414.8 44 40.8 147 46 194.975 52.22 -0.04 0.56 180 20 6.94 727 3200 29.1 500.2 48 60 211 26 336.775 52.28 -0.04 0.42 100 21 7.12 623 2643 30.2 329.4 88 19.2 139 20 230.425 113.24 -0.04 0.56 120 22 6.59 759 1025 30.6 256.2 76 36 150 28 372.225 79.7 -0.04 0.55 140 23 7.17 801 1760 30 390.4 52 12 168 58.5 248.15 81.6 -0.04 0.55 130 24 6.38 590 1501 31.4 97.6 92 16.8 130 7.4 372.225 62.45 -0.04 0.39 110 25 6.8 1283 3850 31.6 402.6 216 67.2 376 56 1187.575 78.76 -0.04 0.92 160 26 7.18 902 2244 29.7 390.4 132 21.6 211 61 514.025 130.09 0.11 1.29 150 27 7.69 754 1951 32.2 305 80 62.4 132 92 514.025 89.7 -0.04 0.56 180 28 7.05 432 917 31.7 317.2 60 24 125 22 230.425 55.51 -0.04 -0.05 160 29 6.47 840 2330 31.6 207.4 132 50.4 139 19 549.475 95.95 -0.03 0.56 140 30 7.19 421 901 31 268.4 40 21.6 133 43 177.25 70.36 -0.04 0.55 70 31 6.78 1256 3510 32.4 427 148 38.4 294 84 797.625 82.21 -0.04 1.86 150 32 7.21 636 1413 30.9 561.2 48 28.8 189 93 283.6 59.63 -0.02 0.55 80 33 7.95 815 1797 30.1 573.4 48 7.2 267 78 336.775 81.12 0.06 0.76 100 34 7.22 689 1549 30.1 439.2 68 24 146 57 248.15 107.99 0.29 0.58 80 35 6.96 660 1593 30 329.4 92 24 145 21 319.05 67.04 0 0.56 150 36 7.19 460 998 31.4 231.8 60 12 132 43 194.975 71.51 -0.02 0.56 100 37 6.61 380 740 32.1 134.2 56 9.6 54 17 106.35 58.89 -0.02 0.55 190 38 7.03 114 280.9 31.3 244 40 19.2 117 1.2 124.075 72.37 -0.02 0.19 30 39 7.25 727 1868 29.9 414.8 44 33.6 216 25.9 336.775 84.09 -0.03 0.85 80 40 7.19 854 3620 30.4 414.8 64 43.2 215 3.2 531.75 58.9 -0.03 0.77 140 41 6.9 330 711 30.9 97.6 44 19.2 54 1.6 159.525 77.32 -0.03 0.43 150 42 6.78 680 1622 30.3 292.8 80 19.2 135 33 230.425 137 0.52 1.18 120 43 6.62 560 1307 30.6 231.8 92 12 128 8.2 301.325 68.81 -0.02 0.56 110 44 6.86 332 665 29.4 305 44 12 123 4.6 141.8 54.36 -0.03 0.35 130 45 6.76 643 1581 31.7 146.4 72 33.6 162 15 389.95 55.63 -0.04 0.56 60 46 7.2 966 2685 31.2 488 168 67.2 351 22.6 655.825 70.94 -0.04 1.01 90 47 7.3 1003 2483 37 475.8 108 28.8 261 44.6 478.575 71.35 -0.04 1.07 170 48 6.92 720 1749 31 305 92 38.4 247 6.4 425.4 90.49 -0.04 0.56 150

Table 3 continued

Sample ID pH TDS EC Temp HCO3- Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ Cl- NO3- PO43- SO42+ H4SiO4 49 7.83 700 1615 30 463.6 160 24 141 42 354.5 72.46 0.44 0.55 100 50 6.93 143 4220 31.3 378.2 276 87 296 54 939.425 89.6 -0.04 2.79 140 51 6.97 754 2202 30.8 292.8 196 81.6 124 86 531.75 67.08 -0.03 0.56 120 52 7.59 264 535 30.4 341.6 56 7.2 131 45 141.8 72.15 -0.04 0.45 60 53 6.2 191 993 31.8 183 32 9.6 116 12 124.075 57.3 -0.04 -0.06 80

Table 4 Locations with highest concentration of geochemical parameters

Sample ID Location Longitude Latitude Parameter(highest conc.)7 Panaiyur 77.4981 9.2599 TDS,HCO3,SO4,Mg 25 Sendamaram 77.4391 9.0611 Cl,Na+26 Virasikamani 77.4484 9.0882 NO3 9 VeddakkuPudur 77.4988 9.1855 H4SiO4 50 Pattanadinpatti 77.4115 8.8876 Ca 32 Velayudapuram 77.3808 9.022 K

Fig.5 Spatial distribution of ionic strength along with integrated contour line of higher concentration of(Na+,HCO3,Ca2+,Mg2+,H4SiO4,K+and NO3-ions)

The Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3 facies is predominant along the foothills,where the underlying rocks are known to contain hornblende[Ca2(Mg,Fe,Al)5(Al,Si)8 O22(OH)2],biotite,quartz(SiO2),and plagioclase feldspar(NaAlSi3O8–CaAl2Si2O8).The water type must have evolved from the interaction of these minerals.This water type is also notedin residential areas and the area of intense agricultural activities(Fig.7).Thus,it may have evolved either due to weathering or by anthropogenic activities.

Fig.6 Piper plot

Infiltration of aquifers by municipal and domestic sewage from urbanized area as well as chemicals used in agricultural lands leads to preferential leaching of high soluble surface and near surface soil Na–Cl salts,which are completely dissolved during resolution(Akiti 1980).Subsequent evaporative concentration may also cause the less soluble salts to precipitate out of solution resulting in the percolating water becoming enriched with Cl(Drever and Smith 1978).The concentration of Ca decreases,however Naincreasesdueto theionic substitution of Ca+by Na+as shown in the following equation:

Study of this correlation matrix depicts the following:

穆尔创作的动物诗歌有着深远的历史背景创作渊源。她对创作动物诗歌的选择不仅和她 的个体经验有关而且和社会发展有关。东西方文化为她的诗歌创作注入了新的活力。作为一名现代诗人,穆尔不仅熟悉和运用了东西方哲学思想,而且把自己的写作与她的人生紧密联系一起,把个体的经历中融入自己的创作中,把瞬息间的思想感情融化在诗行中。

The complete dissolution of Na–Cl may also cause the Ca–HCO3 to precipitate out of solution and resulting in the percolating water becoming enriched with Ca–HCO3 found in near stagnant water bodies(Wotany et al.2013).Considering the lithologic formations present in the study area,hornblende[Ca2(Mg,Fe,Al)5(Al,Si)8O22(OH)2],biotite,quartz(SiO2),and plagioclase feldspar (NaAlSi3O8–CaAl2Si2O8)arethechief minerals.Thus,Caconcentration may increase in groundwater either due to the addition of more Ca ions,leached out from the main rock types(i.e.charnockite and gneiss),or when the Na ion is substituted by the Ca ion on the solid surface by ion exchange process.

Na–Ca–HCO3–Cl water type generally dominates in the northeastern and southeastern side of the study area and may be due to water–rock interaction or weathering process.The weathering of minerals results in higher concentration of HCO3 ions.Thus,it is interpreted that this water type is dominated by the weathering process.The four water types define three evolutionary pathways of dominant facies occurring along the groundwater flow direction of the study area:(1)Ca–Na ion exchange,(2)increase of Ca content either by the addition of Ca ion or Na–Ca ion exchange process and(3)predominate weathering process(Fig.8).Thus,the weathering process dominates over ion exchange as well as anthropogenic processes.The predominance of weathering process indicates significant recharge along the foothills(Ophori and Toth 1989;Subba et al.2007;Srinivasamoorthy et al.2008).

杜思雨仰躺在靠背椅上,闭上眼睛,眼前就是那根美丽的长发丝。一根,两根,越来越多,最后成了一团乱发。思雨也想,本来就是一根很简单的长发丝,怎么就会惹下这么大的麻烦呢?一根美丽的长发丝,竟然变成了一堆乱麻。

Fig.7 Land use map along with hydrogeochemical facies points of the study area

Fig.8 Three evolutionary pathways of dominant facies

The correlation matrix gives information about the interrelationship among the set of variables.Pearson’s Correlation coefficient between ion pairs is the best method of measuring the correlation because it based on the method of covariance(Swan and Sandilands 1995).The Pearson’s correlation coefficient value lies between+1 to-1 and the degree of correlation is said to be perfect,high,moderate and low if the coefficient value will be±1,±0.75 to±1,±0.25 to±0.75 and<±0.25 respectively.The correlation matrix of groundwater samplescollected from study area is shown in Table 5.

The Na–Cl–HCO3 water type,noted along the contact between charnockite and gneiss(Fig.9)and near the river flood plain,indicates that it may have evolved from interaction with the albite-rich gneissic rock or with charnockite as a high amount of Na+is equally present in both rock types.At this stage,it is too early to infer whether Na+is derived from gneiss or charnockite.But higher ionic strength indicates the leaching of ions and river water recharge(Thilagavathi et al.2012;Prasanna et al.2010).

Lithology of the study area is mainly represented by feldspar(CaAl2Si3O8),hornblende[Ca2(Mg,Fe,Al)5(Al,Si)8 O22(OH)2],but biotite,pyroxene,and quartz(SiO2)are also abundantly present in the rock types.Ca–Na–Cl–HCO3 water type found distributed along the higher ionic strength region indicating the longer flow path(Mohrbacher 1983),but it may be derived from the gneissic rock or charnockite.The Ca content is higher in gneissic rocks as compared to charnockite(Rajesh and Santosh 2012).The charnockite consists predominantly of minerals like quartz(SiO2),microcline(potash-rich),and Mg-rich pyroxene(hypersthene),but its Ca-bearing minerals are minor.Thus,this Ca-rich water type may have been derived from the interaction with a gneissic rock.

玉敏睡不着,像上了岸的鱼,在床上活蹦乱跳的,最后竟跳到了小虫身上。小虫睡得正香呢,被玉敏挑弄了几下,酒劲上来了,一翻身将玉敏压到了身下。小虫在玉敏身上忙活了一阵,把玉敏折腾得筋疲力尽。玉敏经了这番折腾,才老老实实地睡了。

The value of Ca2++Mg2+versus HCO3(Fig.12)depicts that HCO3 ion found at an elevated amount in the groundwater,which is balanced by Na+ion,as a silicate weathering process is mainly responsible for releasing the Na+and HCO3 ions into the groundwater system(Subba and Surya 2009).In Fig.12(group A),few sample values also show Ca and Mg isthe dominant cations either due to the preferential release of Ca,Mg from the mineral weathering of exposed bed rock or cation exchange reaction(Thilagavathi et al.2013).In this case,a high concentration of alkalis(Na+and K+)in their halide solution replaces Ca2+and Mg2+on the surface of clay minerals in aquifer matrix.Due to ion exchange process,Na+concentration decreases which is accompanied by an increase of Ca2+and Mg2+concentration in solution(El-Sayed et al.2012).

Fig.9 Spatial distribution of Ionic Strength along with Facies points and lithology

Fig.10 Spatial distribution of Calcium in the study area

Fig.11 Spatial distribution of log pCO2 with hydrogeochemical facies

Figure 11 shows a sharp increase of pCO2 values towards the foothills region,which reveals that the atmospheric interaction has become lesser and recharge predominant.High values of pCO2 indicate high residence time(Prasanna 2008).It suggests that the water type has been recharged by acquiring longer flow path during its infiltration into deeper level near the foothills.A sharp decrease of pCO2 values noted along the other regions reveals that there is more interaction of the groundwater system with the atmosphere(Chidambaram et al.2011).Thus,it can be inferred that the water type has been acquired a shorter flow path,and recharged from a lower elevation.

2. Four types of hydrogeochemical facies have been identified i.e.Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3,Na–Cl–HCO3,Ca–Na–Cl–HCO3,Na–Ca–HCO3–Cl types.Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3 type is predominant along the foothills.This water type normally changes to Na–Cl–HCO3 due to ion exchange process.Na–Ca–HCO3 water type changes to Ca–Na–Cl–HCO3 water type due to either Na–Ca ion exchange process or by the addition of Ca,leached out from Ca-rich rock type.Na–Ca–HCO3 water type changes to Na–Ca–HCO3–Cl type because of increase of weathering process.This increase of HCO3 ion concentration along the direction of water flow shows higher groundwater recharge.Significant weathering process along the direction of water flow reveals higher ionic strength,which infers that water types may have been acquiring longer flow path and recharged from a higher elevation.

The HCO3 can be derived from the silicate minerals dissolved by H2CO3 as shown in the following equation

The spatial distribution of Ca(Fig.10)shows that Ca is high in the southern part of the study area,which isunderlain by gneissic rock only.Thus,this could be the reason for Ca-rich water in this region.Also,the high ionic strength suggests that water may have interacted with the hornblende–biotite-gneiss for a long time.Long flow path(Mohrbacher 1983)from high elevations affords more time for water to equilibrate with gneiss than a short flow path from lower elevations and weaker ionic strength.

Fig.12 Scatter plot of(Ca+Mg)/HCO3 verses(Na+K)/HCO3

Alkaline earths(Ca2+and Mg2+)in their sulfates and part of their carbonates in solution replace the alkalis(Na+and K+)on the surface of clay minerals in the aquifer matrix.Thus,ion exchange process increases the Na+ion concentration and decreasesthe Ca2+and Mg2+in solution(El-Sayed et al.2012).This could be the reason for dominance of Na+and K+in few sample values(Fig.12,group B).Carbonate minerals get dissolved in water during its flow and increase the Ca2+concentration.This hike in Ca2+concentration reflects the release of carbonate during the process of weathering whereas few sample values show an increasing trend of Na+concentration in all the formation,which may be due to alkali mineral weathering or ion exchange process(Thilagavathi et al.2013).

随着企业制度的不断发展和改善,复杂化和实效化已然成为财务会计工作的主要特征。而通过财务会计工作是直接参与企业经营管理的一种体现,财务会计工作的开展是在企业经济活动中所扮演的重要角色,在某种程度上可以决定着一个企业的发展方向和明确发展目标。同时通过财务会计参与经营管理是对各种数据的分析管理,是经济管理的的重要组成部分,在经营过程中起着引导性作用。

Hence it can be inferred that weathering is the major process which controls the chemical composition of groundwater as most of the sample values have higher concentration of HCO3-(Stumm and Morgan 1996),which also indicates recharge(Ophori and Toth 1989;Subba et al.2007;Srinivasamoorthy et al.2008).

Figure 13 shows that the southwestern,northwestern,and central part of the area has high values of H4SiO4/HCO3,which indicate predominant silicate weathering.This part of the study area is underlain by charnockite.Quartz and feldspars(potash feldspar,soda feldspar)are two major minerals in charnockite.Thus,weathering of soda feldspar(albite)and potash feldspars(orthoclase and microcline)may contribute silicate to groundwater(Thilagavathi et al.2013).Feldspars are more susceptible to weathering and alteration than quartz in silicate rocks(Manish et al.2009).Carbonate dissolution also leads to silicate weathering(Ramesh and Gowri 2012),so less carbonate and more silica infiltrated into the aquifer results in silica-rich groundwater in this region.Besides these,other parts show dominant carbonateweathering due to the release of HCO3 during the process of weathering(Thilagavathi et al.2013),which is explained in the following equations:

Fig.13 Spatial distribution of mole ratio of H4SiO4/HCO3

When plagioclase feldspar weathers to kaolinite,the HCO3 content increases in water with increasing anorthite content as shown in the reaction:

The presence of CO2 in the reactant side of the above equation signifies both bicarbonate and silica are yielded by same minerals in a different environment.The bicarbonate yielded is from dissolved CO2 in groundwater(Thilagavathi et al.2013).Silicate minerals weathering also yield to HCO3 in groundwater as a product irrespective of parent minerals composition.Opaline silica releases,in the same reaction,depend upon pH condition.Higher Ca2+and Mg2+values indicate the dissolution of silicate minerals,which contributes calcium and magnesium to groundwater(Thilagavathi et al.2013).Thus,all the abovereactionsrepresent the release of HCO3 ionsinto groundwater,which predominantly reflects weathering process.This also describes the significant recharge along the foothills.Ophori and Toth 1989;Subba et al.2007;Srinivasamoorthy et al.2008).

The majority of sample values clustered around and above the 1:1 line(Fig.14)which shows a predominance of carbonate weathering.Our study supports the statement of Garrels(1976),Datta and Tyagi(1996)that carbonate weathering contribute Ca,Mg,SO4,and HCO3 to the groundwater along with silicate weathering.Most of the samples along the foothills(Fig.14)fall in the equiline,which indicates predominance of both carbonate and silicate weathering,further it is also interesting to note that this cluster is between values of 2 to 8 and higher values representing the carbonate weathering is governed by the lithology,pH,and pCO2 values(Chidambaram et al.2007;Thilagavathi et al.2013).

The Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio determines the quality of groundwater by depicting the process of calcite,dolomite dissolution,and silicate weathering(Ramesh and Gowri 2012).Ratio 1 indicates dolomite dissolution,whereas higher ratio(>1)shows calcite dissolution(Mayo and Loucks 1995).But higher ratio that is greater than 2 is an indication of silicate mineral dissolution,which is responsible for Ca and Mg in groundwater(Katz et al.1998).Most of the sample values have ratio ranges from 1 to 2(Fig.15)that means calcite dissolution is more whereas a few sample values have a ratio more than 2.Thus,both the processes i.e.silicate weathering as well as calcite dissolution have a contribution to the variation of the chemical composition of the groundwater in this area.A majority of sample values near the foothills have a ratio less than 2 which signifies that Mg2+is relatively higher along the foothills because the mountain is predominantly of Charnockites.

由于前人未涉及本领域的研究,本文的研究结论必定存在一定的局限性,主要在于:(1)通过定性研究整理分析得出的感知特征项可能不全面或不严谨,其中某些重要的特征项可能被忽视或遗漏;(2)受资金和时间等因素的限制,所选取的样本范围较窄.这些局限性都可能会影响研究的准确性.因此希望在今后进行更大范围的验证性研究,使研究结论更加严谨.

(二)科技馆从业人员参与职称评定存在较大难度。由于科技馆行业缺乏自有统一的职称体系,都是走的其他专业技术职称系列。各馆职称评定的情况各不相同,目前只能“靠”在现行专业技术职称系列上参加评审与聘任。根据笔者了解,多数科技馆员工根据工作性质和各自情况选择“馆员系列”和“工程师系列”等作为其职称发展通道的较多。如笔者工作的浙江省科技馆挂靠的是群文馆员系列。

Fig.14 Ca+Mg versus SO4+HCO3 indicating predominance of carbonate weathering in the region

Fig.15 Ca2+/Mg2+ratio showing calcite and silicate weathering in the region

4.3 Correlation matrix

The spatial distribution of ionic strength along with hydrogeochemical facies and lithology(Fig.9)shows that almost all the water collected from the wells along the foothills are of the Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3 type.However,the sample values along the northwestern side have weaker ionic strength compared to those on the northern side,which states that water type remains the same but the ionic strength varies because the Piper plot only describes the percentage of major ions,but other minor ions dissolved in solution may be the reason of this varied ionic strength.

Here X is considered to be a soil exchanger,and when groundwater gets mixed with Na(derived from plagioclase feldspar),it isprecipitated and the Ca+ion ispushed away by Na+ion,thus Na+becomes dominant in the groundwater by ion exchange process(Kumar and Allapat 2005),thus the influence of anthropogenic and ion exchange process leads to the Na–Cl water type.

Ions of the same type of charge and different valence number:A relatively strong but not significant correlation exist between Mg2+and Na+(r=0.59),Ca2+and Na+(r=0.52),and Cl-andWhereas statistically insignificant correlation exists between Ca2+and Mg2+with K+(r=0.24,r=0.25 respectively).

Ions of opposite charge and equal valence number:A positive and statistically strong correlation is exhibited between Ca2+and SO42-(r=0.56),Mg2+and(r=0.60),Na+and Cl-(r=0.80),Na+and(0.69)with weaker correlations of K+with Cl-,and NO3-(r=0.34,0.47,and 0.11 respectively).

Ions of the same type of charge and equal valence number:Correlation between Ca2+and Mg2+(r=0.68)is significant.Moreover,correlation between Cl-and HCO3-(r=0.37),Cl-and NO3-(r=0.06),and HCO3-and NO3-(r=0.17)is relatively weak.

Ionsof the opposite type of charge and different valence number:Strong correlation observed between Ca2+and Cl-(r=0.81),Mg2+and Cl-(r=0.79),Na+and SO42-(r=0.65).A negative and statistically insignificant correlation of Mg2+,Na+,and Cl-with PO43-(r=-0.15,-0.07,-0.07 respectively)is noticed.

EC shows good correlation with Ca2+,Mg2+,Na+,Cl-,and SO42-which implies that they are the significant ions for theincrease of ECin groundwater(Georgeet al.2014).Cl-shows good correlation with Ca2+,Mg2+,and Na+indicating the influence of leaching and ion exchange process in the study area(Subramani et al.2009).Significant correlation is observed between ions like SO42+,Ca2+,Mg2+,Na+,and Cl-and between Na+,Cl-,and HCO3,which relates to anthropogenic activities like Na+and Cl-might be derived from septic tanks(Panno et al.1999a)and that of weathering when correlated with Na+and HCO3-(Chidambaram et al.2013).

The highest concentration of HCO3 is also noted in Panaiyur(Table 4).This may be due to contributions from carbonatereleased during theprocessof weathering.About 21 sample values fall above the permissible limit(WHO 2004).In the central part of the region,samples have the highest concentration of Cl.Almost 37 samples fall above the permissible limit(WHO 2004),signifying the anthropogenic activities like infiltration of municipal and domestic sewage into the aquifers and other problems like sewer leakage,faulty septic tank operation,and land fillleachates(Panno et al.1999a)could be the major sources of chloride.The highest concentration of SO4 is found at Panaiyur(Table 4).All the sample values fall below the permissible limit of drinking water.The sources of this ion may be due to the impact of fertilizersasthe study areawas near the agricultural region(Chidambaram 2000).

The purpose of factor analysis is to interpret the structure within the variance,covariance matrix of multivariate data collection.The technique uses the extraction of the Eigen values and Eigen vectors from the matrix of correlations and covariances.The interpretation is based on rotated factors,rotated loadings,and rotated Eigen values.Factor loadings are sorted according to the criteria of(Liu et al.2003),i.e.strong,moderate,and weak;corresponding to absolute loading values of>0.75,0.75–0.50 and 0.50–0.30respectively.Factors with Eigen values greater than 1 are taken into account(Table 5).Three independent factors were extracted from the data set,and it explained 67.69%(Tables 6,7)of the total variance of the original data set,sufficient enough to give a good idea of the data structure.

Table 5 The correlation matrix of major ions(bold indicates strong and statistically significant correlation among the set of variables)

pH EC Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ Cl- HCO3- NO3- PO43- SO42- SiO2 pH 1.00 EC -0.10 1.00 Ca2+ -0.18 0.72 1.00 Mg2+ -0.10 0.71 0.68 1.00 Na+ 0.10 0.76 0.52 0.59 1.00 K+ 0.30 0.28 0.24 0.25 0.33 1.00 Cl- -0.09 0.86 0.81 0.79 0.80 0.34 1.00 HCO3- 0.36 0.50 0.19 0.35 0.69 0.47 0.37 1.00 NO3- 0.13 0.09 0.14 0.02 0.10 0.11 0.06 0.17 1.00 PO43- 0.13 -0.04 0.08 -0.15 -0.07 0.13 -0.07 0.14 0.36 1.00 SO42- 0 0.67 0.56 0.60 0.65 0.22 0.68 0.40 0.24 0.05 1.00 SiO2 -0.15 0.03 0.05 0.09 -0.04 0.01 0.08 -0.13 0.07 -0.09 0.08 1.00

Table 6 Total data variance

Component Initial eigen values Extraction sums of squared loadings Rotation sums of squared loadings Total %of Variance Cumulative% Total %of Variance Cumulative% Total %of Variance Cumulative%1 4.97 41.448 41.44 4.97 41.44 41.44 4.84 40.34 40.34 2 1.86 15.498 56.94 1.86 15.49 56.94 1.80 15.02 55.36 3 1.29 10.747 67.69 1.29 10.74 67.69 1.47 12.32 67.69 4 0.98 8.183 75.87 5 0.74 6.23 82.11 6 0.56 4.7 86.82 7 0.51 4.27 91.09 8 0.36 3.07 94.17 9 0.31 2.62 96.79 10 0.18 1.52 98.32 11 0.16 1.40 99.73 12 0.03 0.26 100.00

Factor 1 accounted for 40.34%of thetotal variancewith positive loadings on EC,Ca,Mg,Na,Cl,and SO4(Tables 6,7).The association of these ions indicates the anthropogenic processes like Na,Cl from cesspool salts and other ions from municipal and domestic sewage(Panno et al.1999a).Thus infiltration of municipal and domestic sewage into some aquifers and other problems like sewer leakage,faulty septic tank operation,and land fill leachates contribute high EC and Cl to the aquifer(Panno et al.1999a).The elevated level of Ca and SO4 can be attributed to the use of chemicals in agricultural fields and domestic sewage from the highly urbanized area(Fianko et al.2009)or it may bea mixing of two processes like ion exchange and anthropogenic factor.

Table 7 Rotated principal component matrix(bold indicates the representation of the parameters in the respective factor loadings)

Parameter Factor 1 2 3 pH -0.14 0.77 0.15 EC 0.91 0.07 0 Ca 0.82 -0.18 0.14 Mg 0.85 -0.03 -0.11 Na 0.82 0.36 -0.04 K 0.33 0.55 0.16 Cl 0.95 0.01 -0.03 HCO3 0.47 0.71 0.12 NO3 0.11 0 0.82 PO4 -0.08 0.11 0.80 SO4 0.78 0.05 0.20 SiO2 0.12 0.44 0.12

Fig.16 Spatial distribution of factor 1

The Factor 2 accountsfor 15.02%of total variance with strong positive loadingson pH,K,and HCO3(Tables 6,7),which indicates the weathering process(Drever 1988).The strong positive loadings of K and HCO3 reveals predominant K-feldspar weathering.

During weathering,a structured aluminosilicate(feldspar)is converted into a cation-poor,degraded aluminosilicate(clay),so cations and silicic acid increases in solution.Thus CO2 is consumed and HCO3 is produced(Chidambaram 2000).Both the carbonate and silicate reactions consume CO2 and produce HCO3 and cations in solution.Higher concentration of HCO3-ionsindicates the predominant weathering process which is an indirect indication of recharge along the foothills(Ophori and Toth 1989;Subba et al.2007;Srinivasamoorthy et al.2008).

为了使高校思想政治理论课能有序的开展实践教学,就要求高校应在实践教学方面加大资金的投入,拨出专款用于思想政治理论课的实践教学活动的组织开展上。此外,思想政治理论课教学部门还要与高校学生处、团委以及各院系积极的沟通,在高校经费申请的同时,也要联合广泛的社会力量争取到更多的资金支持,募集更多的经费用于实践教学,为顺利开展教学活动提供基本的物质保障。思想政治理论课实践教学直接关系到学生的成长与成才,更与高校提高思想政治理论教学质量有密切关系。从长远发展来看,还将关系到我国有效落实素质教育以及最终能否实现人才兴国战略计划。

Factor 3 showsstrong positiveloadingsof PO4 and NO3 with 12.32%of total variance(Table 6,7)which explains theleaching of nitrateand phosphatefrom fertilizer applied in agricultural lands to ground water(Chidambaram et al.2013).Intensive agricultural activities tend to use of chemical fertilizers which lead to an elevated level of NO3 in the region.Excessive cultivation,spreading of animal droppings,sewage mud,and waste matter can all leads to leaching of NO3(Chidambaram et al.2013).The prime characteristic of NO3 leaching is that it occurs due to the presence of excessnitrate in the soil in one season and later leached into groundwater by thenext season(Calvet 1990).Heavy precipitation and denitrification rate also influence NO3 content in leached water(Fianko et al.2009).

4.3.2 Factor score

Spatial variation of a factor and its zone of representation are estimated by factor score which can be determined by two methods like weighted least square and regression method(Chidambaram et al.2012).Factor scores are computed by the regression method.Extremely positive factor scores indicate the areas that are most affected and extremely negative scores indicate the areas unaffected by the chemical process represented by the factor.The factor score for each sample was calculated and spatial distributions of three factors were explained.

The spatial distribution of factor scores for the First factor shows that the higher scores are located in the northwestern,central,and southern part of the study area(Fig.16).The spatial distribution of contamination observed indicate that main contamination sources result from the rural and urban area indicating the influence of human activity.Infiltration of aquifers by cess-pool salts,municipal,and domestic sewage and agrochemicals are the major outcomes of anthropogenic activities.It is obvious that shallow groundwater tends to have the highest contamination as compared to deeper groundwater because leaching will be more prominent in shallow groundwater level(Morriset al.2003).Thehigher valuesarenoted along theraised groundwater gradientand near theresidential area which clearly indicates the infiltration of contaminants leached out from the rural and urban areas into the aquifers.

The spatial distribution of factor scores for the second factor is well represented in the northern,northwestern,and southern part of the study area(Fig.17).Positive scores indicate these parts are mostly affected by weathering i.e.K-feldspar weathering.Thisisbecauseof the fact that these areas are mainly underlain by charnockite and gneiss which contain K-feldspar predominantly.The weathering of K-feldspar is the major process which recharging the aquifer as well as it controls the chemical composition of groundwater.

强硬、严谨、镇定、直率,拉加德在她转型后延续了多年来形成的工作风格。同时,她是法国政府中鲜明的“亲美派”,说话间常夹杂着英语单词,她不熟习法国政治文化,喜欢直言,因此多次在媒体和同僚面前“出丑”,也因此在法国政坛落下“蠢话夫人”“失言部长”的绰号。

The significant representation of the third factor with higher scoresisnoted in thenorthern and southwestern part of the study area(Fig.18)which is mostly affected by agricultural activities.Intensive agricultural activities lead to use of chemical fertilizers and sewage in the agricultural lands.Because of these dominant agricultural practices,the elements like NO3 and PO4 gets leached into the groundwater.Thus a sharp increase of these two ions concentration is observed in this area.

Figure 19 represents higher scores of both factor 2 and factor 3 noted in the northern and central part of the study area,whereas all three factors are predominant along the southern part.It can be inferred from the Fig.19 that the factor 1 falls away from the mountain front,representation of urban sprawl along the downgradient of the water table and factor 2 and 3 are represented near the mountain region.But the third factor as inferred is an anthropogenic factor and is represented by the agriculture predominant regions.The second factor as inferred is represented by weathering and noted along the foothills and also represented in the regions predominantly with water bodies,which influences weathering.

Since the sampleshave been collected for analysisalong the foothills,it is inferred that the sampleshave both higher and lesser ionic strength(0.008–0.013,0.013–0.018),and there are 3 major water types(Ca–Na–Cl–HCO3,Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3,Na–Ca–HCO3–Cl)represented along these foothills(Fig.20).Those which are with higher ionic strength and Ca–Na–Cl–HCO3 type are inferred to be recharged or infiltrated from the MB and have traveled a longer distance(longer residence time).And those which have the lesser ionic strength(0.008–0.013)and following water types(Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3,Na–Ca–HCO3–Cl)are inferred to be recharged along the foothills and with alesser residence time in the host rock.It is inferred that Chittar River promotesthe leaching of ionsand river water recharge.

Fig.17 Spatial distribution of factor 2

Fig.18 Spatial distribution of factor 3

Fig.19 Overlay of spatial distribution of dominant factor,land use and elevation

Fig.20 Conceptual diagram evolved from the Hydrogeochemical interpretation of the present study

5 Conclusions

The study has arrived at the following conclusions:

1. High concentration of both the cations and anions are noted along few locationsof northern and southern part of the study area where high ionic strength is also noted.This indicates that the water has been recharging from higher altitude acquiring a longer flow path and higher residence time.High concentration of ions is also noted along the foothills and in the direction of water flow,which is an indirect indication of recharge process.

Figure 12 infers that,in most of the samples,the groundwater has an excess of HCO3 and falls between 0.1 and 0.5.The HCO3 is derived mainly from the CO2 of the soil zone,during weathering of minerals in country rocks The decay of organic matter and root respiration contributes high CO2 pressure to the sub-surface soil zone,when it combined with rain water(H2O),it forms HCO3(Subba and Surya 2009)as shown in the equation:

丁勇,桂林电子科技大学计算机与信息安全学院教授、副院长,广西密码学与信息安全重点实验室主任;主要研究方向为公钥密码理论、同态加密、密码安全协议、区块链等;主持国家自然科学基金、中国密码发展基金、国防预研基金、广西区自然科学基金等项目10余项;发表论文60余篇,其中SCI/EI检索30余篇,出版学术专著1部、工信部规划教材1部。

3. The relationship of Ca and Mg indicates that most of the sample values are clustered around the equiline indicating a predominance of both silicate and carbonate weathering,as mineral weathering releases both bicarbonate and silica.Furthermore,there are relatively higher values of Mg along the foothills due to weathering of charnockites in the MB.

4.The chemical composition of groundwater is mainly controlled by weathering and anthropogenic activities.But weathering is more dominant than anthropogenic activities.The higher HCO3 and H4SiO4 concentration are mainly derived from the carbonate and silicate weathering process.Elevated concentration of HCO3 ion indicates predominant weathering as well as higher recharge process in this region.

除传统的历史文化外,地方民俗文化对三峡游客也十分具有吸引力。很多游客在游记中描述了土家族民俗文化和巴东纤夫文化体验,表示参与性的土家婚嫁仪式十分受欢迎,如一位北京游客在游记中所写:

5. The statistical analysis reveals that anthropogenic activities,weathering,and leaching are the major factors controlling the hydrogeochemistry of the area.The spatial distribution of factor score shows that dominant hydrogeochemical regimes are distributed along the direction of water flow,highly urbanized area and near to the agricultural lands.Thus,the hydrogeochemical evolution indicates infiltration of contaminants leached from the residential area due to anthropogenic activities,weathering process along the direction of water flow and leaching of nitrate from agricultural lands.This higher weathering processisan indicative of recharge.

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the Science&Engineering Research Board(SERB),New Delhi(No:SB/S4/ES-699/2013)for providing necessary financial support to carry out this study and the author Banajarani Panda wish to express her sincere thanks to Department of Science and Technology for providing the Inspire Fellowship(No:DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/[IF150615],27th October 2015).

Compliance with ethical standards

5.提出了进一步发展中国特色社会主义的八个基本要求。报告提出,在新的历史条件下夺取中国特色社会主义新胜利,必须坚持人民主体地位,坚持解放和发展社会生产力,坚持推进改革开放,坚持维护社会公平正义,坚持走共同富裕道路,坚持促进社会和谐,坚持和平发展,坚持党的领导。这八个基本要求,是对以往建设和发展中国特色社会主义历史经验的科学总结,是对中国特色社会主义规律的科学把握,对于进一步发展中国特色社会主义具有重要指导作用。

Conflict of interest On behalf of all authors,the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

Akiti TT(1980)Etude geochimique et isotopique de quelques aquifers du Ghana.Thesis,Universte Paris

Andrew H,Manning D,Solomon K(2003)Using noble gases to investigate mountain-front recharge.JHydrol 275:194–207

Baillie MN,Hogan JF,Ekwurzel B,Wahi AK,Eastoe CJ(2007)Quantifying water sources to a semiarid riparian ecosystem,San Pedro River,Arizona.JGeophys Res Biogeosci 112(G3):1–13

Balasubramanian A,Sastri JCV(1994)Groundwater resources of Tamirabarani River basin,Tamil Nadu,India,Inland Water Resour 484–501

Barbieri M,Boschetti T,Petitta M,Tallini M(2005)Stable isotope(2H,18O and 87Sr/86Sr)and hydrochemistry monitoring for groundwater hydrodynamics analysis in a karst aquifer(Gran Sasso,Central Italy).Appl Geochem 20:2063–2081

Bartolino JR,Cole JC(2002)Ground-water resources of the middle Rio Grande basin,New Mexico(No.1222).US Geological survey

Bhagyashri C,Maggirwar B,Umrikar N(2011)Influence of various factors on the fluctuation of groundwater level in hard rock terrain and its importance in the assessment of groundwater.JGeol Mining Res 3:305–317

Calvet R(1990)Nitrates-agriculture-water.In:International symposium by INRA,Paris

CGWB(2009)District groundwater brochure Tirunelveli district,Tamil Nadu.Technical Report Series,5

Chidambaram S(2000)Hydrogeochemical studies of groundwater in Periyar District,Tamil Nadu,India.Unpublished Ph.D thesis,Department of Geology,Annamalai University

Chidambaram S,Vijayakumar V,Srinivasamoorthy K,Anandhan P,Prasanna MV,Vasudevan S(2007)A study on variation in ionic composition of aqueous system in different lithounits around Perambalur region, Tamilnadu. J Geol Soc India 70(6):1061–1069

Chidambaram S,Ramanathan AL,Prasanna MV,Anandhan P,Srinivasamoorthy K,Vasudevan S(2008)Identification of hydrogeochemically active regimes in groundwaters of Erode District,Tamilnadu–a statistical approach.Asian J Water Environ Pollut 5(3):93–102

Chidambaram S,Prasanna MV,Karmegam U,Singaraja C,Pethaperumal S,Manivannan R,Anandhan P,Tirumalesh K(2011)Significanceof pCO2 valuesin determining carbonatechemistry in groundwater of Pondicherry region,India.Front Earth Sci5(2):197–206

Chidambaram S,Prasanna MV,Singaraja C,Thilagavathi R,Pethaperumal S,Tirumalesh K(2012)Study on the saturation index of the carbonates in the groundwater using WATEQ4F,in layered coastal aquifers of Pondicherry.J Geol Soc India 80(6):813–824

Chidambaram S,Balakrishna PM,Manivannan R,Karmegam U,Singaraja C,Anandhan P,Prasanna MV,Manikandan S(2013)Environmental hydrogeochemistry and genesis of fluoride in groundwaters of Dindigul district,Tamilnadu(India).Environ Earth Sci 68:333–342.doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1741-9

Covino TP(2005)Stream-groundwater interactions in a mountain to valley transition:impacts on watershed hydrologic response and stream water chemistry.Diss.Report,Montana State University-Bozeman,College of Agriculture

Datta PS,Tyagi SK(1996)Major ion chemistry of groundwater in Delhiarea:chemical weathering processesand groundwater flow regime.JGeol Soc India 47:179–188

Davis JC(1973)Statistics and data analysis in geology.Wiley,New York

Davis SN,de Wiest RJ(1966)Hydrogeology.Wiley,New York,pp 250–363

Drever IJ(1988)The geochemistry of natural waters,2nd edn.Prentice Hall,Englewood Cliffs,p 388

Drever JI,Smith CL(1978)Cyclic wetting and drying of thesoil zone asan influenceon thechemistry of groundwater and terrains.Am JSci 278:1448–1454

El-Sayed M,Moustafa M,El-Fadl A,Shawky HA(2012)Impact of hydrochemical processes on groundwater quality,WadiFeiran,South Sinai,Egypt.Aust JBasic Appl Sci 6(3):638–654

Feth JH(1966)Nitrogen compounds in natural water—A review.Water Resour Res 2(1):41–58

Fianko JR,Osae S,Adomako D,Achel DG(2009)Relationship between land use and groundwater quality in six districts in the eastern region of Ghana.Environ Monit Assess 153:139–146

Freeze AR,Cherry JA(1979)Groundwater.Prentice-Hall Inc,Englewood cliffs,p 604

Garrels RM(1976)A survey of low temperature water mineral relations.In:Interpretation of environmental isotope and hydrogeochemical data in groundwater hydrology.International Atomic Energy Agency,Vienna,pp 65–84

George NJ,Ubom AI,Ibanga JI(2014)Integrated approach to investigate the effect of leachate on groundwater around the Ikot Ekpene Dumpsitein Akwa Ibom State,Southeastern Nigeria.Int JGeophys

Gerner DA(2013)A novel strategy for estimating groundwater recharge in arid mountain regions and its application to parts of the Jebel Akhdar Mountains(Sultanate of Oman).Dissertation report,Technische Universität Dresden

Harmann HH(1960)Modern factor analysis.University of Chicago Press,Chicago

James FH,Brenda E(2004)Quantifying mountain front recharge,Project report.Department of hydrology and water resources

Jeyaruba T,Thushyanthy M(2009)The effect of agriculture on quality of groundwater:a case study.Middle-East Jof Sci Res 4(2):110–114

Kaiser HF(1958)The Varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.Psychometrika 23:187–200

Kambhammettu BVNP,James P,King Praveena A(2011)Evaluation of mountain-front recharges estimation techniques for Southern New Mexico basins.Int JWater Resour Environ Eng 3(3):66–72

Katz BG,Gopalan TB,Bullen TD,Davis JH(1998)Use of chemical and isotopic tracers to characterise the interaction between groundwater and surface water in mantled karst.Groundw J 35:1014–1028

Kohfahl C,Christoph S,Jose BH,Hanno M,Franzisca FC,Asaf P(2008)Recharge sources and hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in semiarid and karstic environments:a field study in the Granada Basin(Southern Spain).Appl Geochem 23:846–862

Kumar D,Allapat BJ(2005)Analysis of leachate pollution index and formulation of sub-leachate pollution indices.Waste Manag Res 23(3):230–239

Li X,Zhang L,Hou X(2008)Use of hydrogeochemistry and environmental isotopes for evaluation of groundwater in Qingshuihe Basin,northwestern China.Hydrogeol J 16(2):335–348

Liu CW,Lin KH,Kuo YM(2003)Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in black foot disease in Taiwan.Sci Total Environ 313:77–89

Mahlknecht J,Gárfias-Solis J,Aravena R,Tesch R(2006)Geochemical and isotopic investigations on groundwater residence time and flow in the Independence Basin,Mexico.J Hydrol 324(1):283–300

Manish K,Kalpana K,Umesh KS,Ramanathan AL(2009)Hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment of Muktsar,Punjab:conventional graphical and multivariate statistical approach.Environ Geol 57:873–884

Mayo AL,Loucks MD(1995)Solute and isotopic geochemistry and groundwater flow in the Central Wasatch Range,Utah.JHydrol(Amsterdam)172:31–59

Merz A(1985)Mountain-front recharge from the Santa Rita Mountains to the Tucson Basin.M.Sc Thesis,The University of Arizona

Mohrbacher CJ(1983)Stableisotopesand ground water chemistry as indicators of mountain front recharge,Tucson basin,Pima County,Arizona.Hydrogeol Water Resour Arizona Southwest 13:77–84

Morbacher CJ(1984)Mountain-front recharge to the Tucson Basin from the Santa Catalina Mountains.M.Sc.thesis,Department of Geosciences,University of Arizona,Tucson

Morris BL,Lawrence AR,Chilton PJC,Adams B,Calow RC,Klinck BA(2003)Groundwater and its susceptibility to degradation:a global assessment of the problem and options for management,vol 3.United Nations Environment Programme,Nairobi

Nwankwoala HO,Udom GJ(2011)Hydrogeochemical facies and ionic ratios of groundwater in port Harcourt,Southern Nigeria.Res JChem Soil 3:87–101

Ophori DU,Toth J(1989)Patterns of groundwater chemistry,Ross Creek Basin,Alberta,Canada.Groundwater 27(1):20–26

Panabokke CR,Pathirana SRK,Wijekoon D(2002)Water quality of agro-wellsin thecoastal sand aquifer in Trincomalee District.In:Symposium proceedings on the Use of Groundwater for Agriculture in Sri Lanka,University of Peradeniya,Sri Lanka,pp 85–98

Panno SV,Hackley KC,Greenberg SE(1999a)A possible technique for determining the origin of sodium and chloride in natural water preliminary results from a site of northeastern Illinois.Abstract in environmental horizons 2000.In:Conference proceedings,57

Ping J,Nichol C,Wei X(2014)Quantification of groundwater recharge using the chloride mass balance method in a semi-arid mountain terrain,South Interior British Columbia,Canada.JChem Pharm Res 6(1):383–388

Piper AM (1944)A graphical procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis.Trans Am Geophys Union 25:914–923

Plummer LN,Sanford WE,Bexfield LM,Anderholm SK,Busenberg E(2004)Using geochemical data and aquifer simulation to characterize recharge and groundwater flow in the Middle Rio Grande Basin,New Mexico.Groundwater recharge in a desert environment:the Southwestern United States,pp 185–216

Plummer LN,Bexfield LM,Anderholm SK,Sanford WE,Busenberg E(2004a)Geochemical characterization of ground-water flow in the Santa Fe Group aquifer system,Middle Rio Grande Basin,New Mexico.U.S.Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report, 03-4131 395, http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri034131/

Prasanna MV(2008)Hydrogeochemical studies in the Gadilam river basin,Tamilnadu.Unpublished Ph.D.Thesis,Annamalai University

Prasanna MV,Chidambaram S,Shahul Hameed A,Srinivasamoorthy K(2010)Study of evaluation of groundwater in Gadilam basin using hydrogeochemical and isotope data.Environ Monit Assess 168(1):63–90

Public Works Department(2002)Groundwater perspectives:a profile of Tirunelvelli District.Tamilnadu Public works Department,India,Tamilnadu

Rajesh HM,Santosh M(2012)Charnockitesand charnockites.Geosci Front 3:737–744

Ramesh K and Gowri VS(2012)Silicateor calciteweathering in wetdry climate in lower Varahanadi basin,Tamilnadu,India—A determinant in global warming.doi:10.6088/ijes.00202030098

Rushton KR,Ward C(1979)The estimation of groundwater recharge.JHydrol 41(3):345–361

Salama RB,Bartle G,Farrington P,Wilson V(1994)Basin geomorphological controls on the mechanism of recharge and discharge and its effect on salt storage and mobilization—comparative study using geophysical surveys.JHydrol 155:1–2

Schreiber ME,Moline GR,Bahr JM(1999)Using hydrogeochemical facies to delineate groundwater flow paths in fractured shale.Groundw Monit Rev 19(1):95–109

Singh VS,Mondal NC,Ron Barker,Thangarajan M,Rao TV,Subrahmanyam K(2003)Assessment of groundwater regime in Kodaganar river basin(Dindigul District,Tamilnadu).Unpublished Tech.Report,2003-GW-269,104

Smalley RC(1983)An isotopic and geochemical investigation of the hydrogeologic and geothermal systems in the Safford Basin,Arizona.Dissertation Report,The University of Arizona

Smoor PB(1967)Hydrochemical facies study of ground water in the Tucson Basin

Srinivasamoorthy K,Chidambaram S,Prasanna MV,Vasanthavigar M,Peter JA,Anandhan P(2008)Identification of major sources controlling groundwater chemistry from a hard rock terrain—a case study from Metturtaluk,Salem district,Tamilnadu India.JEarth Syst Sci 117(1):49–58

Stumm W,Morgan JJ(1996)Aquatic chemistry.Wiley,New York

Subba RN,Surya R(2009)Major ion chemistry of groundwater in a river basin:a study from India.Environ Earth Sci 61:757–775

Subba RN,SrinivasaRao KV,Devadas JD,Devavarma D,ThirupathiRao B,Subrahmanyam A,Arjunudu K,Ratnakantababu K,Venkatakrishna T(2007)Quality of groundwater in the coastal areaof Visakhapatnam Bhimunipatnam,Andhra Pradesh.Indian JGeochem 22:193–208

Subramani T(2005)Hydrogeology and identification of geochemical processes in Chittar River Basin,Tamil Nadu.Ph.D.Thesis,Anna University

Subramani T,Elango L,Damodarasamy SR(2005a)Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Chithar River basin,Tamil Nadu,India.J Environ Geol 47:1099–1110

Subramani T,Elango L,Srinivasalu S,Marikio T(2005b)Geological setting and groundwater chemistry in Chithar River basin,Tamil Nadu,India.JIndian Mineral 39:108–119

Subramani T,Rajmohan N,Elango L(2009)Groundwater geochemistry and identification of hydro geochemical processes in a hard rock region,Southern India.Environ Monit Asses.,doi:10.1007/s10661-009-0781-4

Swan ARH,Sandilands M(1995)Introduction to geological data analysis.Blackwell,Oxford

Theis CV(1940)The source of water derived from wells.Civ Eng 10(5):277–280

Thilagavathi R,Chidambaram S,Prasanna MV,Thivya C,Singaraja C(2012)A study on groundwater geochemistry and water quality in layered aquifers system of Pondicherry region,southeast India.Appl Water Sci 2(4):253–269

Thilagavathi R,Chidambaram S,Thivya C,Prasanna MV,Singaraja C,Tirumalesh K,Pethaperumal S(2013)Delineation of natural and anthropogenic process controlling hydrogeochemistry of layered aquifer sequence.Proc Natl Acad Sci India,Sect A,Phys Sci.doi:10.1007/s40010-013-0114-4

Thivya C,Chidambaram S,Singaraja C,Thilagavathi R,Prasanna MV,Anandhan P,Jainab I(2013)A study on the significance of lithology in groundwater quality of Maduraidistrict,Tamil Nadu(India).Environ Dev Sustain 15(5):1365–1387

Thivya C,Chidambaram S,Thilagavathi R,Prasanna MV,Singaraja C,Adithya VS,Nepolian M(2015)A multivariate statistical approach to identify the spatio-temporal variation of geochemical process in a hard rock aquifer.Environ Monit Assess.doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4738-5

Wahi AK,Hogan JF,Ekwurzel B,Baillie MN,Eastoe CJ(2008)Geochemical quantification of semiarid mountain recharge.Ground Water 46(3):414–425

WHO(2004)Guidelines for drinking water quality,3rd edn,vol 1,Recommendation,Geneva,515

Wotany ER,Ayonghe SN,Fantong WY,Wirmvem MJ,Ohba T(2013)Hydrogeochemical and anthropogenic influence on the quality of water sources in the Rio del Rey Basin,South Western,Cameroon,Gulf of Guinea.Afr JEnviron Sci Technol 7(12):1053–1069

Yousef AH,Priju CP,Prasad NBN(2015)Delineattion of groundwater potential zones in Deep Midland Aquifers along Bharathpuzha River basin,Kerala using geophysical methods.Aquat Proced 4:1039–1046

Banaja Rani Panda,S. Chidambaram,N. Ganesh,V. S. Adithya,M. V. Prasanna,K. Pradeep,U. Vasudevan
《Acta Geochimica》 2018年第3期
《Acta Geochimica》2018年第3期文献

服务严谨可靠 7×14小时在线支持 支持宝特邀商家 不满意退款

本站非杂志社官网,上千家国家级期刊、省级期刊、北大核心、南大核心、专业的职称论文发表网站。
职称论文发表、杂志论文发表、期刊征稿、期刊投稿,论文发表指导正规机构。是您首选最可靠,最快速的期刊论文发表网站。
免责声明:本网站部分资源、信息来源于网络,完全免费共享,仅供学习和研究使用,版权和著作权归原作者所有
如有不愿意被转载的情况,请通知我们删除已转载的信息 粤ICP备2023046998号