1 Introduction and Main Results

Let f(z)be a function meromorphic in the complex plane C.We assume that the reader is familiar with the standard notations and results in Nevanlinna’s value distribution theory of meromorphic functions such as the characteristic function T(r,f),proximity function m(r,f),counting function N(r,f),the first and second main theorems etc.;see,for example,[1,4,9].The notation S(r,f)denotes any quantity that satisfies the condition:S(r,f)=o(T(r,f))as r→∞possibly outside an exceptional set of r of finite linear measure.

In general,a nonlinear algebraic differential equation is of the form

where P is a polynomial in f and its derivatives with meromorphic coefficients.One can rewrite equation(1.1)as

where I is a finite set of multi-indices(λ0,λ1,···,λn)= λ and αλ(z)is a meromorphic function.We define a differential monomial in f as

“你把这个带去吧！放在包袱里，别叫人给你抢去，娘一个钱也没有。若饿肚时，你就去卖掉，买个干粮吃吧！”走出门去还听母亲说：“遇见日本子，你快伏在蒿子下。”

where

Thus,the left hand side of equation(1.2)can be expressed as a finite sum of differential monomials,which will be called a differential polynomial in f,that is,

The degree γPand the weight ΓPof P are defined by

We say that a meromorphic solution f of equation(1.2)is admissible if T(r,αλ(z))=S(r,f)holds for all λ∈I.

For the first-order algebraic differential equations,Malmquist[10]proved the following famous theorem in 1913.

we have

admits a transcendental meromorphic solution,then the equation can be reduced into a Riccati differential equation

where ai(z)(i=0,1,2)are rational functions.

The proof of Theorem 1.1 was independent of the Nevanlinna theory at the outset.In 1933,Yosida[14]proved the Malmquist’s theorem using the Nevanlinna theory.In 1970s,Laine[8],Yang[13],and Hille[7]gave a generalization of Theorem 1.1 with the coefficients of R(z,f)being meromorphic functions.Steinmetz[12]extended Malmquist’s theorem to the following result.

Theorem 1.2 Let R(z,f)be birational function.If the following differential equation

admits a transcendental meromorphic solution,then the differential equation can be reduced into

where ai(z)(i=0,1,···,2n)are rational functions and at least one of them does not vanish.

From the proof of Lemma 3.1 in[3],we have the following result.

Theorem 1.3 If the algebraic differential equation

where P(z,f,f′···,f(n))is a differential polynomial in f with meromorphic coefficients and ai(z)(i=0,1,···,p)and bj(z)(j=0,1,···,q)are meromorphic functions,possesses an admissible meromorphic solution,then R(z,f)is reduced to a polynomial in f of degree≤ΓP.

The proof of Theorem 1.3 given by Gackstatter and Laine[2]strongly relies on Valiron deficient values.Steinmetz[12]constructed a number of auxiliary functions in his proof on Theorem 1.3.In this article,we will give a more simple proof of Theorem 1.3.From our proof and the fact that the counting function N(r,f)of entire function vanishes identically.We can obtain the following result easily.

本书是阿里巴巴集团前总参谋长曾鸣对互联网时代的重要趋势做出革命性解读的作品，披露了其对于未来商业模式的思考和判断。作者基于在阿里巴巴集团十几年的实践经验，以及对互联网、大数据和人工智能的深入思考，在书中提出了未来30年新的商业模式——智能商业。“网络协同”和“数据智能”是新商业生态系统的D N A，在万物互联的时代，只有智能商业的新物种才能生存和发展。作者曾鸣，现任阿里巴巴集团学术委员会主席，湖畔大学教育长，阿里巴巴商学院院长。2006～2017年担任阿里巴巴集团总参谋长。

Corollary 1.4 If the algebraic differential equation

where P(z,f,f′···,f(n))is a differential polynomial in f with meromorphic coefficients and ai(z)(i=0,1,···,p)and bj(z)(j=0,1,···,q)are meromorphic functions,possesses an admissible entire solution,then R(z,f)is reduced to a polynomial in f of degree≤ γP.

旅游纪念品长“同一张脸”，不仅会让游客产生审美疲劳，且不利于推广各个景区的独特旅游价值。尤其是同质化、低端化、地摊化的旅游纪念品会大大拉低国人的旅游购物消费。据统计，旅游购物在欧美国家占旅游业收入的50%到60%，在亚洲发达国家占40%以上，而在我国目前只占28%，国内外游客对旅游商品的满意度可见一斑。

The following two examples show that the estimations in Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.4 are sharp.

Example 1.5 It is easy to check that f(z)=tanz solves the following differential equation

式中:Ini=((Ini1,Ini2,,Iniu),TBi,TEi)表示输入，Ini1,Ini2,,Iniu表示输入Ini的u(u≥1)个属性，TBi和TEi分别表示输入Ini的开始时间和结束时间；表示操作，OPi表示操作名称，和分别表示操作opi的开始时间和结束时间；fi:Ini→Outi表示输入Ini到输出Outi之间的转换逻辑函数；Outi=((Outi1,Outi2,,Outis),TBi+1,TEi+1)表示输出，Outi1,Outi2,,Outis表示输出Outi的s(s≥1)个属性，TBi+1,TEi+1分别表示输出Outi的开始时间和结束时间。

Example 1.6 It is easy to check that f(z)=zezsolves the following differential equation

In Example 1.5,we have ΓP=6 and in Example 1.6,we have γP=3.

2 Some Lemmas

The following lemmas will be needed in the proof of our result.

Lemma 2.1(see[9]) Let f(z)be a meromorphic function.Then,for all irreducible rational functions in f,we have

and Ω[z,f]is a polynomial in f and its derivatives with meromorphic coefficients αλ,λ ∈ I,such that

Theorem 1.1 Let R(z,f)be birational function.If a differential equation of the form

Lemma 2.2(see[6,9]) Let f(z)be a transcendental meromorphic solution of

The degree γMλ and the weight ΓMλ of Mλ are defined by

黑与白是永远的流行色，太极也正是黑白两色组成，苏泊尔R9713净水机正是演化了极简式设计，和MUJI风格非常相似。

are polynomials in f with meromorphic coefficients such that

such that the meromorphic coefficients ai(z),bj(z)satisfy

②混凝土浇筑。采用直升导管法浇筑。先往进料斗里注入适量的水泥砂浆，在储料簸箕内储存足够量的混凝土，一次进料确保挤出隔离球，并埋住导管底部。浇筑时连续作业，导管埋入混凝土中的深度控制在1～6m之间。同一槽孔内混凝土面保持均匀上升，各控制点高差控制在0.5m以内。上升速度不小于2m/h，浇筑过程中每30分钟测量一次槽孔内混凝土顶面深度，绘制混凝土上升曲线图，以指导浇筑施工和导管拆卸，控制混凝土浇筑质量。

If p≤q,then

曾连发五支白羽令，率江湖盟中人对抗北方异族，江湖盟过半人数折于这一役中，谢星亦是身死，但终取得惨胜，初出茅庐的江湖少年，往往把谢星看作他们心中的榜样。

Theorem 1.2 was finally extended to the case of R(z,f)rational with meromorphic coefficients by Rieth[11]and He-Laine[5].In 1980,Gackstatter and Laine[2]gave a generalized result of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2.

where mj≥ εkj,is at most S(r,f).

Lemma 2.3 Let f be a meromorphic function with N(r,f)/=S(r,f)(counting multiplicities)and let the coefficients ai(i=1,2,···,n)of R(z,f)be small meromorphic functions with respect to f.Let

be the maximal order of zeros and poles of the functions aiat zj,where ai(zj)=0limeans that zjis a zero of ai(z)with multiplicity li,ai(zj)=∞limeans that zjis a pole of ai(z)with multiplicity li.Then,for any ε＞ 0,the counting function of points zjsuch that

一向温和镇定的朋友，在我面前刷刷地流下泪来——她和家人都没有料到，父亲是得了老年痴呆症。他的各种不可理喻的行为，包括把袜子塞进冰箱里，把擦脸油放进微波炉；忘了在烧水壶里加水就插上电干烧；不肯洗澡，拒绝理发，去了超市在外面转悠几小时找不到回家的路……在诊断结果出来后都有了解释。

3 A New Proof of Theorem 1.3

Proof We assume that f(z)is an admissible meromorphic solution of equation(1.3).Define

We may consider the proximity function m(r,P[z,f])in two parts:

If z∈E1,then we have

Therefore,by the logarithmic derivative Lemma,we obtain

Hence,

If z ∈ E2,as λ0+ λ1+ ···+ λn ≤ γPfor any all λ =(λ0,λ1,···,λn)∈ I,we have

Thus,for some constant K＞0,we have

水的存在不仅是TSR进行的前提，也是反应产物，不过TSR过程中水的产量一直充满争议。Worden等[10]通过氧同位素分析法对岩层的物质研究发现，TSR反应过程生成了水。而Machel等[11]的研究发现，加拿大某酸性气田的储层流体中所含的NaCl质量分数与初始质量分数基本相同，从而推测出TSR反应过程中并没有产生太多的水。因此，还需要开展大量的研究，对TSR反应过程中是否产生大量水进行论证。

Combining(3.1)and the above inequality,we obtain

Next,we will give an estimation of counting function N(r,P[z,f])of poles of P[z,f].Obviously,each pole of function P[z,f]comes from the poles of functions f(z)or αλ(z)(λ ∈ I)in(1.3).Namely,each pole of function R(z,f)comes from the poles of functions f(z)or αλ(z)(λ∈I).Without loss of generality,we may assume that all poles of R(z,f)come from the poles of f(z).

Let nj(z0)be multiplicity of zero or pole of aj(z)at z0,(j=0,1,···,p).If z0is not a zero and pole of aj(z),then nj(z0)=0.Let mj(z0)be multiplicity of zero or pole of bj(z)at z0,(j=0,1,···,q).Denote M(z0)=max{n0(z0),···,np(z0),m0(z0),···,mq(z0)}.If z0is a pole with multiplicity k of f(z)and a pole of R(z,f),then from equation(1.3),z0is a pole of R(z,f)with multiplicity at most kΓP.Let

“你选择雪萤的哥哥作为车祸的受害者，原来是为了破坏我和雪萤之间的关系？你太卑鄙、太残忍了。”一杭愤愤地说。

and N(r,E)denote the counting function of the poles(considering the multiplicity)of R(z,f)in E.Then from Lemma 2.3,we have N(r,E)=S(r,f).If M(z0)＜,and then z0must be a pole of Q(z,f).At this case,z0is an analytic point of R(z,f)or a pole of R(z,f)with multiplicity not greater than k max{p−q,0}+M(z0).Hence,we have

Namely,

Therefore,

By Lemma 2.1 and the above inequality,we get

On the other hand,because all the poles of function P[z,f]come from the poles of function f(z)and its coefficients αλ(z)(λ ∈ I),and every pole of multiplicity k of f(z),possibly except the pole of αλ(z),is a pole with multiplicity at mostthus

we also have

Hence,we obtain max{p,q}≤ΓP.

Now,we are going to show that p＞q.If p≤q,then by Lemma 2.2,we have m(r,P[z,f])=S(r,f).According to(3.2),N(r,P[z,f])=S(r,f)when p≤q.Thus,we obtain

which implies that p=q=0,so this is impossible.Thus,we have p＞q.

Next,we shall deal with two cases.

Case 1 p−q≥ΓP.Then by(3.4),we have q≤p−ΓP≤ΓP−ΓP=0,thus q=0.

Case 2 p−q＜ ΓP.Select now γ ∈ C,such that

[23] Sheldon Slmon, “US-Southeast Asia Relations: ASEAN Stumbles”, Comparative Connections, May 2012.

By substituting g:=into(1.3),we obtain

where Ω[z,g]is a differential polynomial in g and its derivatives with meromorphic coefficients,and

Obviously,g is an admissible solution of equation(3.6).By(3.5),we see that the nominator of(3.6)is of degree q+ΓP,while the denominator is of degree q.Clearly,the right-hand side of(3.6)is irreducible,otherwise,R(z,f)would be reducible.By the similar argument as in inequality(3.3),we have

As γΩ ≤ ΓPby(3.7),we have q+ ΓP ≤ ΓP,thus q=0.

Therefore,R(z,f)is reduced to a polynomial in f with meromorphic coefficients.We denote the degree of R(z,f)by d:=degfR(z,f).By the similar discussion as in(3.4),we obtain

Therefore,we have d≤ ΓP.Thus,the proof of Theorem 1.3 is completed.

UAV+RFID技术信息采集的路径规划问题，其本质是在布满生产所需的生产设备的生产环境下，在合理的时间内，在满足RFID能够读取到所有在制品信息的前提下，寻找一条最优飞行路径进行在制品信息采集。

老马说：“这就是你的事了，但我认为死者真正死因是急性肾衰竭。而不是以往的多数死于失血过多，尸体有很明显的尿中毒症状，当然具体的死因还需要进一步验证。”老马边说边用扩张器撑开死者伤口，又说：“你看，伤口中还进行了必要的止血手术，而且肯定还进行过严格的消毒程序，不然在这么热的天伤口部分肯定先腐烂，但是你看，伤口部位腐败程度反而低于身体其它部位。”

References

[1]Cherry W,Ye Z.Nevanlinna’s Theory of Value Distribution.Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2001

[2]Gackstatter F,Laine I.Zur theorie der gewöhnlichen differentialgleichungen im komplexen.Ann Polon Math,1980,38:259–287

[3]Halburd R G,Korhonen R J.Finite order meromorphic solutions and the discrete Painlevé equations.Proc London Math Soc,2007,94(3):443–474

[4]Hayman W K.Meromorphic Functions.Oxford:Clarendon Press,1964

[5]He Y Z,Laine I.The Hayman-Miles theorem and the differential equation(y′)n=R(z,y).Analysis,1990,10:387–396

[6]He Y Z,Xiao X Z.Algebroid functions and ordinary differential equations.Beijing:Science Press,1988

[7]Hille E.On some generalizations of the Malmquist theorem.Math Scand,1976,39:59–79

[8]Laine I.On the behaviour of the solutions of some first order differential equations.Ann Acad Sci Fenn Ser A,1971,497:1–26

[9]Laine I.Nevanlinna theory and complex differential equations.Berlin:Walter de Gruyter,1993

[10]Malmquist J.Sur les fonctionsà un nombre fini des branches définies par les équations différentielles du premier ordre.Acta Math,1913,36:297–343

[11]Rieth J V.Untersuchungen gewisser Klassen gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen erster und zweiter Ordnung im Komplexen[D].Aachen,1986

[12]Steinmetz N.Eigenschaften eindeutiger Lösungen gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen im Komplexen[D].Karlsruhe,1978

[13]Yang C C.A note on Malmquist’s theorem on first order differential equations.Yokohama Math J,1972,20:115–123

[14]Yosida K.A generalization of Malmquist’s theorem.J Math,1993,9:253–256